Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 263

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Preparation and Hydrogen Storage Properties of Zeolite-Templated Carbon Materials Nanocast via Chemical Vapor Deposition: Effect of the Zeolite Template and Nitrogen Doping

Yang, Zhuxian, Xia, Yongde, Sun, Xuezhong, Mokaya, Robert·2006·The Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Abstract

Carbon materials have been prepared using zeolite 13X or zeolite Y as template and acetonitrile or ethylene as carbon source via chemical vapor deposition (CVD) at 550-1000 degrees C. Materials obtained from acetonitrile at 750-850 degrees C (zeolite 13X) or 750-900 degrees C (zeolite Y) have high surface area (1170-1920 m(2)/g), high pore volume (0.75-1.4 cm(3) g(-1)), and exhibit some structural ordering replicated from the zeolite templates. Templating with zeolite Y generally results in materials with higher surface area. High CVD temperature (> or =900 degrees C) results in low surface area materials that have significant proportions of graphitic carbon and no zeolite-type structural ordering. The nitrogen content of the samples derived from acetonitrile varies between 5 and 8 wt %. When ethylene is used as a carbon precursor, high surface area (800-1300 m(2)/g) materials are only obtained at lower CVD temperature (550-750 degrees C). The ethylene-derived carbons retain some zeolite-type pore channel ordering but also exhibit significant levels of graphitization even at low CVD temperature. In general, the carbon materials retain the particle morphology of the zeolite templates, with solid-core particles obtained at 750-850 degrees C while hollow shells are generated at higher CVD temperature (> or =900 degrees C). We observed hydrogen uptake of up to 4.5 wt % and 45 g H(2)/L (volumetric density) at -196 degrees C and 20 bar for the carbon materials. The hydrogen uptake was found to be dependent on surface area and was therefore influenced by the choice of zeolite template and carbon source. Zeolite Y-templated N-doped carbons had the highest hydrogen uptake capacity. Gravimetric and volumetric methods gave similar uptake capacity at 1 bar (i.e., 1.6 and 2.0 wt % for zeolite 13X and Y-templated N-doped carbons, respectively). Our findings show that zeolite-templated carbons are attractive for hydrogen storage and highlight the potential benefits of functionalization (nitrogen-doping).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp0639849

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 263

Metadata

Authors
Yang, Z., Xia, Y., Sun, X., & Mokaya, R.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
2006-09-01
Volume
110
Issue
37
Pages
18424-18431
ISSN
  • 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6106
OpenAlex
W2024354959
Cited by
263
References
0
FWCI
9.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preparation and Hydrogen Storage Properties of Zeolite-Templated Carbon Materials Nanocast via Chemical Vapor Deposition: Effect of the Zeolite Template and Nitrogen Doping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp0639849
The paper
Yang, Z., Xia, Y., Sun, X., & Mokaya, R. (2006). Preparation and Hydrogen Storage Properties of Zeolite-Templated Carbon Materials Nanocast via Chemical Vapor Deposition: Effect of the Zeolite Template and Nitrogen Doping. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0639849

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.