The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High-Efficiency Carrier Multiplication and Ultrafast Charge Separation in Semiconductor Nanocrystals Studied via Time-Resolved Photoluminescence
Abstract
We demonstrate novel methods for the study of multiple exciton generation from a single photon absorption event (carrier multiplication) in semiconductor nanocrystals (or nanocrystal quantum dots) that are complementary to our previously reported transient absorption method. By monitoring the time dependence of photoluminescence (PL) from CdSe nanocrystals via time-correlated single photon counting, we find that carrier multiplication is observable due to the Auger decay of biexcitons. We compare these data with similar studies using transient absorption and find that the two methods give comparable results. In addition to the observation of dynamical signatures of carrier multiplication due to the Auger decay, we observe spectral signatures of multiple excitons produced from the absorption of a single photon. PL spectra at short times following excitation with high-energy photons are red-shifted compared to the single-exciton emission band, which is consistent with previous observations of significant exciton-exciton interactions in nanocrystals. We then show using a combination of transient absorption and time-resolved PL studies that charge transfer between a nanocrystal and a Ru-based catalyst model compound takes place on a time scale that is faster than Auger recombination time constants, which points toward a possible design of donor-acceptor assemblies that can be utilized to take advantage of the carrier multiplication process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tunable Near-Infrared Optical Gain and Amplified Spontaneous Emission Using PbSe Nanocrystals
Schaller, R. D., Petruska, M. A., & Klimov, V. I. (2003) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp0311660 · Cited by 321
Self-citation
Cited by
Schottky Solar Cells Based on Colloidal Nanocrystal Films
Luther, J. M., Law, M., Beard, M. C., Song, Q., Reese, M. O., Ellingson, R. J., & Nozik, A. J. (2008) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl802476m · Cited by 928
Jun, H. K., Careem, M. A., & Arof, A. K. (2013) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.01.030 · Cited by 373
Infrared photovoltaics made by solution processing
Sargent, E. H. (2009) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2009.89 · Cited by 351
Quantum confined colloidal nanorod heterostructures for solar-to-fuel conversion
Wu, K., & Lian, T. (2016) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00472a · Cited by 305
Colloidal quantum dot solar cells
Emin, S., Singh, S. P., Han, L., Satoh, N., & Islam, A. (2011) · Solar Energy · doi:10.1016/j.solener.2011.02.005 · Cited by 282
Sykora, M., Koposov, A. Y., McGuire, J. A., Schulze, R. K., Tretiak, O., Pietryga, J. M., & Klimov, V. I. (2010) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn100131w · Cited by 271
Self-citationNanomaterials and nanostructures for efficient light absorption and photovoltaics
Yu, R., Lin, Q., Leung, S.-F., & Fan, Z. (2012) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2011.10.002 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Schaller, R. D., Sykora, M., Jeong, S., & Klimov, V. I.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-10-31
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 50
- Pages
- 25332-25338
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W2059172955
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.