The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hydration Behavior under Confinement by Nanoscale Surfaces with Patterned Hydrophobicity and Hydrophilicity
Abstract
We perform molecular dynamics simulations of water confined between nanoscale surfaces (≈3.2 × 3.2 nm 2 ) with various patterns of hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity at T = 300 K, −0.05 GPa ≤ P ≤ 0.2 GPa, and plate separations 0.5 nm ≤ d ≤ 1.6 nm. We find that the water surface density in the first hydration layer is considerably higher at a hydrophobic patch surrounded by hydrophilic borders than it is at a purely hydrophobic surface with the same area, highlighting the importance of heterogeneity on hydrophobicity at nanoscopic length scales. Increasing the pressure causes a progressive blurring of the difference between interfacial water densities manifest at hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces, with only minor differences remaining at 0.2 GPa. At P = −0.05 GPa and d = 0.6 nm, a single layer of hydrophilic sites along the border of the hydrophobic nanoscale plates is sufficient to prevent bulk cavitation, in contrast to the behavior observed in the absence of the hydrophilic sites. At small separation between the nanoscale surfaces ( d ≤ 0.7 nm), a single hydrophilic site at the center of the hydrophobic plates prevents complete drying of the confined space, with water molecules remaining next to the hydrophilic site for at least 1 ns.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fluidity of water confined to subnanometre films
Raviv, U., Laurat, P., & Klein, J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35092523 · Cited by 660
Fluidity of Hydration Layers Nanoconfined between Mica Surfaces
Leng, Y., & Cummings, P. T. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.026101 · Cited by 200
Cited by
Interfacial Water at Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Surfaces: Slip, Viscosity, and Diffusion
Sendner, C., Horinek, D., Bocquet, L., & Netz, R. R. (2009) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la901314b · Cited by 567
Phase Transitions Induced by Nanoconfinement in Liquid Water
Giovambattista, N., Rossky, P. J., & Debenedetti, P. G. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.050603 · Cited by 253
Self-citationFactors that Determine Zeolite Stability in Hot Liquid Water
Zhang, L., Chen, K., Chen, B., White, J. L., & Resasco, D. E. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.5b07398 · Cited by 208
Giovambattista, N., Rossky, P. J., & Debenedetti, P. G. (2012) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-032811-112007 · Cited by 149
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Giovambattista, N., Debenedetti, P. G., & Rossky, P. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-12-02
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1323-1332
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W1971575474
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.