The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Nanostructural Organization in Ionic Liquid/Water Mixtures
Abstract
Molecular dynamics simulations have been carried out to investigate nanostructural organization in mixtures of 1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium nitrate ionic liquid and water at multiple water concentrations. Evolution of the polar network, water network, and micelle structures is visualized and analyzed via partial radial distribution functions. The calculated static partial structure factors show that within the range of water contents examined, polar networks, water networks, and micelles possess an approximately invariant characteristic length at around 20 A. Furthermore, the above calculations point out that, as the amount of water increases, the polar network is continuously broken up (screened) by the intruding water, while the structural organization of the water network and the micelle exhibits a turnover. At the turnover point, the most ordered micelle (cation-cation) structure and water (water-anion-water) network are formed. Thereafter, the structural organization abates drastically, and only loose micelle structure exists due to the dominant water-water interactions. The simulated turnover of structural organization agrees with the sharpest peak in the experimentally obtained structure factor in aqueous solutions of similar ionic liquids; the simulated water structure reveals that water can form liquidlike associated aggregates due to the planar symmetry and strong basicity of NO(3)-, in agreement with experiment. The turnover of structural organization of micelles results from the persistent competition between the hydrophobic interactions of the nonpolar groups and the breakup of the charged polar network with increasing water content, whereas the turnover of the water network results from the competition between the water-water and water-anion interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Influence of chloride, water, and organic solvents on the physical properties of ionic liquids
Seddon, K. R., Stark, A., & Torres, M.-J. (2000) · Pure and Applied Chemistry · doi:10.1351/pac200072122275 · Cited by 2,293
Cammarata, L., Kazarian, S. G., Salter, P. A., & Welton, T. (2001) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b106900d · Cited by 1,441
Cited by
Ionic liquids and catalysis: Recent progress from knowledge to applications
Olivier-Bourbigou, H., Magna, L., & Morvan, D. (2010) · Applied Catalysis A: General · doi:10.1016/j.apcata.2009.10.008 · Cited by 1,639
Multiscale Studies on Ionic Liquids
Dong, K., Liu, X., Dong, H., Zhang, X., & Zhang, S. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00776 · Cited by 773
Singh, T., & Kumar, A. (2007) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp0726889 · Cited by 455
Understanding Ionic Liquids through Atomistic and Coarse-Grained Molecular Dynamics Simulations
Wang, Y., Jiang, W., Yan, T., & Voth, G. A. (2007) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar700160p · Cited by 331
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiang, W., Wang, Y., & Voth, G. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-02-27
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 4812-4818
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W2053010217
- Cited by
- 458
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.