The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Bias-Exchange Approach to Protein Folding
Open accessAbstract
By suitably extending a recent approach [Bussi, G.; et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 13435] we introduce a powerful methodology that allows the parallel reconstruction of the free energy of a system in a virtually unlimited number of variables. Multiple metadynamics simulations of the same system at the same temperature are performed, biasing each replica with a time-dependent potential constructed in a different set of collective variables. Exchanges between the bias potentials in the different variables are periodically allowed according to a replica exchange scheme. Due to the efficaciously multidimensional nature of the bias the method allows exploring complex free energy landscapes with high efficiency. The usefulness of the method is demonstrated by performing an atomistic simulation in explicit solvent of the folding of a Triptophane cage miniprotein. It is shown that the folding free energy landscape can be fully characterized starting from an extended conformation with use of only 40 ns of simulation on 8 replicas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Laio, A., & Parrinello, M. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.202427399 · Cited by 5,626
Self-citationDesigning a 20-residue protein
Neidigh, J. W., Fesinmeyer, R. M., & Andersen, N. H. (2002) · Nature Structural Biology · doi:10.1038/nsb798 · Cited by 793
Assessing the Accuracy of Metadynamics
Laio, A., Rodriguez-Fortea, A., Gervasio, F. L., Ceccarelli, M., & Parrinello, M. (2005) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp045424k · Cited by 517
Self-citation
Cited by
Well-Tempered Metadynamics: A Smoothly Converging and Tunable Free-Energy Method
Barducci, A., Bussi, G., & Parrinello, M. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.020603 · Cited by 3,184
Laio, A., & Gervasio, F. L. (2008) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/71/12/126601 · Cited by 1,619
Self-citationUsing collective variables to drive molecular dynamics simulations
Fiorin, G., Klein, M. L., & Hénin, J. (2013) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268976.2013.813594 · Cited by 1,053
Wei, G., Xi, W., Nussinov, R., & Ma, B. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00562 · Cited by 436
To milliseconds and beyond: challenges in the simulation of protein folding
Lane, T. J., Shukla, D., Beauchamp, K. A., & Pande, V. S. (2013) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2012.11.002 · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- Piana, S., & Laio, A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-04-10
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 4553-4559
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W1995907662
- Cited by
- 598
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Bias-Exchange Approach to Protein Folding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp067873l
- The paper
- Piana, S., & Laio, A. (2007). A Bias-Exchange Approach to Protein Folding. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp067873l
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.