The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Is Spin-Component Scaled Second-Order Møller−Plesset Perturbation Theory an Appropriate Method for the Study of Noncovalent Interactions in Molecules?
Abstract
Testing of the spin-component scaled second-order Møller-Plesset (SCS-MP2) method for the computation of noncovalent interaction energies is done with a database of 165 biologically relevant complexes. The effects of the spin-scaling procedure (i.e., MP2 vs SCS-MP2), the basis set size, and the corrections for basis set superposition error (BSSE) are systematically examined. When using two-point basis set extrapolations for the correlation energy, augmentation of the atomic orbital basis with computationally costly diffuse functions is found to be obsolete. In general, SCS-MP2 also improves results for noncovalent interactions statistically on MP2, and significant outliers are removed. Moreover, it is shown that effects of BSSE and one-particle basis set incompleteness almost cancel each other in the case of triple-zeta sets (SCS-MP2/TZVPP or SCS-MP2/cc-pVTZ without counterpoise correction), which opens a practical route to efficient computations for large systems. We recommend SCS-MP2 as the preferred quantum chemical wave function based method for the noncovalent interactions in large biologically relevant systems when reasonable coupled-cluster with single and double and perturbative triple excitations (CCSD(T)) calculations cannot be performed anymore. A comparison to MP2 and CCSD(T) interaction energies for n-alkane dimers, however, indicates (and this also holds to a lesser extent for hydrogen-bonded systems) limitations of SCS-MP2 when treating chemically "saturated" interactions. The different behavior of second-order perturbation theory for saturated and for stacked pi-systems is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular Electronic‐Structure Theory
Helgaker, T., Jørgensen, P., & Olsen, J. (2000) · doi:10.1002/9781119019572 · Cited by 2,594
Cited by
Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S., & Krieg, H. (2010) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3382344 · Cited by 59,686
Self-citationDensity functional theory with London dispersion corrections
Grimme, S. (2011) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.30 · Cited by 2,829
Self-citationDispersion-Corrected Mean-Field Electronic Structure Methods
Grimme, S., Hansen, A., Brandenburg, J. G., & Bannwarth, C. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00533 · Cited by 1,621
Self-citationDo Special Noncovalent π–π Stacking Interactions Really Exist?
Grimme, S. (2008) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200705157 · Cited by 1,153
Self-citationr2SCAN-3c: A “Swiss army knife” composite electronic-structure method
Grimme, S., Hansen, A., Ehlert, S., & Mewes, J.-M. (2021) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0040021 · Cited by 1,107
Self-citationRiley, K. E., Pitoňák, M., Jurečka, P., & Hobza, P. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr1000173 · Cited by 759
Stabilizing and Modulating Color by Copigmentation: Insights from Theory and Experiment
Trouillas, P., Sancho-García, J. C., De Freitas, V., Gierschner, J., Otyepka, M., & Dangles, O. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00507 · Cited by 654
Rokob, T. A., Hamza, A., Stirling, A., Soós, T., & Pápai, I. (2008) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200705586 · Cited by 403
Kozuch, S., Gruzman, D., & Martin, J. M. L. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp1070852 · Cited by 398
Noncovalent interactions in biochemistry
Riley, K. E., & Hobza, P. (2011) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.8 · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Antony, J., & Grimme, S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-05-17
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 4862-4868
- ISSN
- 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5215
- OpenAlex
- W1966400780
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.