The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Surface Polarity on Water Contact Angle and Interfacial Hydration Structure
Abstract
We perform molecular dynamics simulations of water in the presence of hydrophobic/hydrophilic walls at T = 300 K and P = 0 GPa. For the hydrophilic walls, we use a hydroxylated silica model introduced in previous simulations [Lee, S. H.; Rossky, P. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100, 3334. Giovambattista, N.; Rossky, P. J.; Debenedetti, P. G.; Phys. Rev. E 2006, 73, 041604.]. By rescaling the physical partial atomic charges by a parameter 0 ≤ k ≤ 1, we can continuously transform the hydrophilic walls (hydroxylated silica, k = 1) into hydrophobic apolar surfaces ( k = 0). From a physical point of view, k is the normalized magnitude of a surface dipole moment, and thus it quantifies the polarity of the surface. We calculate the contact angle of water for 0 ≤ k ≤ 1. We find that, at least for the present homogeneous, atomically flat, and defect-free surface model, the magnitude of the surface dipole correlates with the contact angle in a one-to-one correspondence. In particular, we find that polar surfaces with 0 < k ≤ k c = 0.4 are macroscopically hydrophobic; that is, the contact angle is larger than 90°. For the cutoff value k = k c, the magnitude of the dipole moment of the polar silica surface unit is 41% that of the water molecule dipole moment. We also study the water orientation distributions next to the walls (a microscopic property). We find that these distributions also correlate with the contact angle in a one-to-one correspondence. Thus, the structure of confined water, the surface polarity, and the contact angle are in a direct correspondence to each other, and therefore, each quantifies the hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity of the surface.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Thermal Conductance of Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Interfaces
Ge, Z., Cahill, D. G., & Braun, P. V. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.186101 · Cited by 455
Fluidity of Hydration Layers Nanoconfined between Mica Surfaces
Leng, Y., & Cummings, P. T. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.026101 · Cited by 200
Cited by
Interfacial Water at Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Surfaces: Slip, Viscosity, and Diffusion
Sendner, C., Horinek, D., Bocquet, L., & Netz, R. R. (2009) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la901314b · Cited by 567
Godawat, R., Jamadagni, S. N., & Garde, S. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0902778106 · Cited by 357
Phase Transitions Induced by Nanoconfinement in Liquid Water
Giovambattista, N., Rossky, P. J., & Debenedetti, P. G. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.050603 · Cited by 253
Self-citationMolecular simulation of water confined in nanoporous silica
Bonnaud, P. A., Coasne, B., & Pellenq, R. J.-M. (2010) · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/22/28/284110 · Cited by 182
Giovambattista, N., Rossky, P. J., & Debenedetti, P. G. (2012) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-032811-112007 · Cited by 149
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Giovambattista, N., Debenedetti, P. G., & Rossky, P. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-07-21
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 32
- Pages
- 9581-9587
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W2100329296
- Cited by
- 505
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.