The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Calculating Geometric Surface Areas as a Characterization Tool for Metal−Organic Frameworks
Abstract
Metal−organic frameworks (MOFs) synthesized in a building-block approach from organic linkers and metal corner units offer the opportunity to design materials with high surface areas for adsorption applications by assembling the appropriate building blocks. In this paper, we show that the surface area calculated in a geometric fashion from the crystal structure is a useful tool for characterizing MOFs. We argue that the accessible surface area rather than the widely used Connolly surface area is the appropriate surface area to characterize crystalline solids for adsorption applications. The accessible surface area calculated with a probe diameter corresponding to the adsorbate of interest provides a simple way to screen and compare adsorbents. We investigate the effects of the probe molecule diameter on the accessible surface area and discuss the implications for increasing the surface area of metal−organic frameworks by the use of catenated structures. We also demonstrate that the accessible surface area provides a useful tool for judging the quality of a synthesized sample. Experimental surface areas can be adversely affected by incomplete solvent removal during activation, crystal collapse, or interpenetration. The easily calculated accessible surface area provides a benchmark for the theoretical upper limit for a perfect crystal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Millward, A. R., & Yaghi, O. M. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0570032 · Cited by 2,876
Cited by
Algorithms and tools for high-throughput geometry-based analysis of crystalline porous materials
Willems, T. F., Rycroft, C. H., Kazi, M., Meza, J. C., & Haranczyk, M. (2012) · Microporous and Mesoporous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.08.020 · Cited by 1,925
Methane Storage in Metal–Organic Frameworks: Current Records, Surprise Findings, and Challenges
Peng, Y., Krungleviciute, V., Eryazici, I., Hupp, J. T., Farha, O. K., & Yildirim, T. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja4045289 · Cited by 1,018
Zhang, L., Zhang, F., Yang, X., Long, G., Wu, Y., Zhang, T., Leng, K., Huang, Y., Ma, Y., Yu, A., et al. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep01408 · Cited by 721
Sarkisov, L., & Harrison, A. (2011) · Molecular Simulation · doi:10.1080/08927022.2011.592832 · Cited by 658
A Series of Isoreticular, Highly Stable, Porous Zirconium Oxide Based Metal–Organic Frameworks
Guillerm, V., Ragon, F., Dan‐Hardi, M., Devic, T., Vishnuvarthan, M., Campo, B., Vimont, A., Clet, G., Yang, Q., Maurin, G., et al. (2012) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201204806 · Cited by 499
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Düren, T., Millange, F., Férey, G., Walton, K. S., & Snurr, R. Q.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-10-01
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 42
- Pages
- 15350-15356
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2002542825
- Cited by
- 556
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.