The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hydrogen and Methane Adsorption in Metal−Organic Frameworks: A High-Pressure Volumetric Study
Abstract
We report hydrogen and methane adsorption isotherms in two prototypical metal−organic framework compounds (i.e., MOF5 and ZIF8) over a large temperature (30−300 K) and pressure (up to 65 bar) range using a fully computer-controlled Sieverts apparatus. We find that, in a volumetric method, a proper choice of real gas equation of state is critical for obtaining reliable isotherm data. The widely used van der Waals equation of state (EOS) is not adequate to describe H 2 and CH 4, while the modified Benedict−Webb−Rubin (MBWR) EOS works well, even at very low temperatures and high pressures. With the known sample mass and bulk density, the skeleton density and the specific pore volume of MOF5 and ZIF8 were also measured. In addition to excess and absolute adsorption isotherms, we also introduce an “effective adsorption” which compares the amounts of gas adsorbed in a container with and without the adsorbent. At low temperatures, the maximal excess adsorption capacities of H 2 and CH 4 in MOF5 are found to be 10.3 wt % and 51.7 wt %, respectively, while they are only 4.4 wt % and 22.4 wt % in ZIF8. From the temperature-dependent isotherm data, the isosteric heat of adsorption ( Q st ) was also estimated. The excess Q st 's for the initial H 2 and CH 4 adsorption in MOF5 are ∼4.8 kJ/mol and ∼12.2 kJ/mol, respectively. We obtained similar Q st 's for ZIF8. We hope that the detailed isotherm curves reported here over a large temperature and pressure range will be a critical test for future grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations and force-field models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wu, H., Chua, Y. S., Krungleviciute, V., Tyagi, M., Chen, P., Yildirim, T., & Zhou, W. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja404514r · Cited by 1,457
Self-citationMethane Storage in Metal–Organic Frameworks: Current Records, Surprise Findings, and Challenges
Peng, Y., Krungleviciute, V., Eryazici, I., Hupp, J. T., Farha, O. K., & Yildirim, T. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja4045289 · Cited by 1,018
Self-citationHan, S. S., Mendoza-Cortés, J. L., & Goddard III, W. A. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b802430h · Cited by 594
Adsorption of CO2, CH4, and N2 on Zeolitic Imidazolate Frameworks: Experiments and Simulations
Pérez‐Pellitero, J., Amrouche, H., Siperstein, F. R., Pirngruber, G., Nieto‐Draghi, C., Chaplais, G., Simon‐Masseron, A., Bazer‐Bachi, D., Peralta, D., & Bats, N. (2010) · Chemistry – A European Journal · doi:10.1002/chem.200902144 · Cited by 417
Energy-based descriptors to rapidly predict hydrogen storage in metal–organic frameworks
Bucior, B. J., Bobbitt, N. S., Islamoglu, T., Goswami, S., Gopalan, A., Yildirim, T., Farha, O. K., Bagheri, N., & Snurr, R. Q. (2019) · Molecular Systems Design & Engineering · doi:10.1039/c8me00050f · Cited by 308
Self-citationBen, T., Ren, H., Ma, S., Cao, D., Lan, J., Jing, X., Wang, W., Xu, J., Deng, F., Simmons, J. M., et al. (2009) · Angewandte Chemie · doi:10.1002/ange.200904637 · Cited by 291
Effect of para–ortho conversion on hydrogen storage system performance
Ubaid, S., Xiao, J., Zacharia, R., Chahine, R., & Bénard, P. (2014) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.05.101 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, W., Wu, H., Hartman, M. R., & Yildirim, T.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-10-05
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 44
- Pages
- 16131-16137
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2003370141
- Cited by
- 497
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.