The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Highly Ordered TiO2 Nanotube Arrays with Controllable Length for Photoelectrocatalytic Degradation of Phenol
Abstract
Highly ordered TiO 2 nanotube array prepared by a potentiostatic anodization shows a considerable potential for improving the transport of the photogenerated electrons in the TiO 2 film, since the ordered architecture can provide a unidirectional electric channel and reduce the grain boundaries. Here, we report on the application of highly ordered TiO 2 nanotube arrays with different lengths for the photoelectrocatalytic degradation of phenol. The lengths of the nanotube arrays can be controlled by the electrolyte media, anodization time, or both. The photoelectrocatalytic activity shows a dependence on the length of the nanotube arrays. Under 3.1 mW/cm 2 irradiance of ultraviolet light, a short nanotube array shows better photoelectrocatalytic activity than a long nanotube array, which can be explained by the reduced recombination effects. When compared with a P25 TiO 2 particulate film with similar thickness and geometric area, the nanotube array shows a stronger attachment to the parent titanium substrate and a better photoelectrocatalytic activity for phenol degradation owing to the improved electron transport and reduced charge recombination. This superior electron transport is further supported by the remarkably enhanced anodic photocurrent response in the degradation of phenol.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode
FUJISHIMA, A., & HONDA, K. (1972) · Nature · doi:10.1038/238037a0 · Cited by 34,169
Self-citationEnvironmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis
Hoffmann, M. R., Martin, S. T., Choi, W., & Bahnemann, D. W. (1995) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr00033a004 · Cited by 18,495
Photocatalysis on TiO2 Surfaces: Principles, Mechanisms, and Selected Results
Linsebigler, A. L., Lu, G., & Yates, J. T. (1995) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr00035a013 · Cited by 11,575
Cited by
TiO2 photocatalysis: Design and applications
Nakata, K., & Fujishima, A. (2012) · Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2012.06.001 · Cited by 3,651
Self-citationXiao, F.-X. (2012) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/am302462d · Cited by 328
Zeng, J., Liu, S., Cai, J., & Zhang, L. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp1005617 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, Z., Zhang, X., Nishimoto, S., Jin, M., Tryk, D. A., Murakami, T., & Fujishima, A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-12-13
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 253-259
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2031202213
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.