The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Kinetic Analysis of Catalytic Reduction of 4-Nitrophenol by Metallic Nanoparticles Immobilized in Spherical Polyelectrolyte Brushes
Abstract
We present a study on the catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol by sodium borohydride in the presence of metal nanoparticles. The nanoparticles are embedded in spherical polyelectrolyte brushes, which consist of a polystyrene core onto which a dense layer of cationic polyelectrolyte brushes are grafted. The average size of the nanoparticles is approximately 2 nm. The kinetic data obtained by monitoring the reduction of 4-nitrophenol by UV/vis-spectroscopy could be explained in terms of the Langmuir−Hinshelwood model: The borohydride ions transfer a surface-hydrogen species in a reversible manner to the surface. Concomitantly 4-nitrophenol is adsorbed and the rate-determining step consists of the reduction of nitrophenol by the surface-hydrogen species. The apparent reaction rate can therefore be related to the total surface S of the nanoparticles, to the kinetic constant k related to the rate-determining step, and to the adsorption constants K Nip and K BH 4 of nitrophenol and of borohydride, respectively. In all cases, an induction time t 0 was observed of the order of minutes. The reciprocal induction time can be treated as a reaction rate that is directly related to the kinetics of the surface reaction because there is a linear relation between 1/( kt 0 ) and the concentration of nitrophenol in the solution. All data obtained for t 0 so far and a comparison with data from literature indicate that the induction time is related to a slow surface reconstruction of the nanoparticles, the rate of which is directly related to the surface reaction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Narayanan, R., & El-Sayed, M. A. (2005) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp051066p · Cited by 1,298
Cited by
Syafiuddin, A., Salmiati, Salim, M. R., Beng Hong Kueh, A., Hadibarata, T., & Nur, H. (2017) · Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society · doi:10.1002/jccs.201700067 · Cited by 415
Kinetic Analysis of the Catalytic Reduction of 4-Nitrophenol by Metallic Nanoparticles
Gu, S., Wunder, S., Lu, Y., Ballauff, M., Fenger, R., Rademann, K., Jaquet, B., & Zaccone, A. (2014) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp5060606 · Cited by 401
Self-citationBaruah, B., Gabriel, G. J., Akbashev, M. J., & Booher, M. E. (2013) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la305068p · Cited by 391
Simple size-controlled synthesis of Au nanoparticles and their size-dependent catalytic activity
Suchomel, P., Kvitek, L., Prucek, R., Panacek, A., Halder, A., Vajda, S., & Zboril, R. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-22976-5 · Cited by 382
Sodium borohydride stabilizes very active gold nanoparticle catalysts
Deraedt, C., Salmon, L., Gatard, S., Ciganda, R., Hernandez, R., Ruiz, J., & Astruc, D. (2014) · Chem. Commun. · doi:10.1039/c4cc05946h · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Wunder, S., Polzer, F., Lu, Y., Mei, Y., & Ballauff, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-04-21
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 8814-8820
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2061266901
- Cited by
- 1,217
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kinetic Analysis of Catalytic Reduction of 4-Nitrophenol by Metallic Nanoparticles Immobilized in Spherical Polyelectrolyte Brushes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp101125j
- The paper
- Wunder, S., Polzer, F., Lu, Y., Mei, Y., & Ballauff, M. (2010). Kinetic Analysis of Catalytic Reduction of 4-Nitrophenol by Metallic Nanoparticles Immobilized in Spherical Polyelectrolyte Brushes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp101125j
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.