The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Molecular Simulations and Experimental Studies of CO2, CO, and N2 Adsorption in Metal−Organic Frameworks
Abstract
Atomistic grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations were performed to understand the interplay of factors (pore size, heat of adsorption, open metal sites, electrostatics, and ligand functionalization) contributing to adsorption of CO 2, CO, and N 2 in MOFs. Four MOFs—IRMOF-1, IRMOF-3, Cu-BTC, and Zn 2 [bdc] 2 [dabco]—were chosen for comparison. Binary mixtures (CO 2 /CO) and (CO 2 /N 2 ) containing 5%, 50%, and 95% CO 2 were examined. CO 2 is preferentially adsorbed over CO and N 2 in all MOFs. Cu-BTC displays higher selectivities for CO 2 over CO at lower pressures and CO 2 over N 2 at all pressures for all mixtures due to the increase in electrostatic interactions of CO 2 with the exposed copper sites. However, IRMOF-3 shows surprisingly high selectivities for CO 2 over CO for 50% and 95% mixtures at higher pressures due to the presence of amine-functionalized groups and high pore volume. CO 2 selectivities increase with increasing CO 2 concentration in the gas mixtures at total pressures above 5 bar. On the basis of the results obtained, it can be concluded that construction of smaller pore size MOFs relative to sorbate size with embedded open metal sites or functionalized groups can lead to greater enhancement of these adsorption separation systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
CO2 Capture and Separations Using MOFs: Computational and Experimental Studies
Yu, J., Xie, L.-H., Li, J.-R., Ma, Y., Seminario, J. M., & Balbuena, P. B. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00626 · Cited by 1,047
Metal–Organic Frameworks for Air Purification of Toxic Chemicals
DeCoste, J. B., & Peterson, G. W. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr4006473 · Cited by 958
Metal–Organic Frameworks against Toxic Chemicals
Islamoglu, T., Chen, Z., Wasson, M. C., Buru, C. T., Kirlikovali, K. O., Afrin, U., Mian, M. R., & Farha, O. K. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00828 · Cited by 707
Performance-Based Screening of Porous Materials for Carbon Capture
Farmahini, A. H., Krishnamurthy, S., Friedrich, D., Brandani, S., & Sarkisov, L. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01266 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Karra, J. R., & Walton, K. S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-08-25
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 37
- Pages
- 15735-15740
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2065465350
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Simulations and Experimental Studies of CO2, CO, and N2 Adsorption in Metal−Organic Frameworks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp105519h
- The paper
- Karra, J. R., & Walton, K. S. (2010). Molecular Simulations and Experimental Studies of CO2, CO, and N2 Adsorption in Metal−Organic Frameworks. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp105519h
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.