Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 190

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Au−Cu Alloy Nanoparticles with Tunable Compositions and Plasmonic Properties: Experimental Determination of Composition and Correlation with Theory

Motl, Nathan E., Ewusi-Annan, Ebo, Sines, Ian T., Jensen, Lasse, Schaak, Raymond E.·2010·The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Abstract

For plasmonic alloy nanoparticles, theoretical modeling and experimental characterization are both central to our capabilities involving predictable synthesis and targeted applications. This article uses composition-tunable colloidal Au−Cu nanoparticles as a model system for exploring the issue of reliable experimental determination of composition in plasmonic alloy nanoparticles and correlation of this experimental data with theoretical predictions. Highly uniform spherical Au 1- x Cu x alloy nanoparticles were synthesized with compositions ranging from x = 0 to 0.5. The particle compositions were analyzed independently using both powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), which represent two of the most common nanoparticle composition analysis techniques. The plasmon resonance frequencies, determined experimentally for each sample using UV−vis spectroscopy, red shift with increasing copper content as expected. These experimentally determined plasmon resonance frequencies were then compared to the values predicted theoretically based upon the XRD and EDS composition measurements. Although EDS and XRD are both found to be acceptable methods for experimentally determining the composition, careful data analysis suggests that XRD composition measurements are more accurate for smaller values of x, whereas EDS measurements are more accurate for larger values of x . In addition, some discrepancies between the experimentally determined plasmon resonance frequencies and those predicted by theory suggest inaccuracies in using a simple linear mixing rule to determine the dielectric constant of the Au−Cu alloys.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp107637j

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 190

Metadata

Authors
Motl, N. E., Ewusi-Annan, E., Sines, I. T., Jensen, L., & Schaak, R. E.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2010-10-25
Volume
114
Issue
45
Pages
19263-19269
ISSN
  • 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-7455
OpenAlex
W2329090315
Cited by
190
References
2
FWCI
4.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.