Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 206

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cobalt Oxide Nanowall Arrays on Reduced Graphene Oxide Sheets with Controlled Phase, Grain Size, and Porosity for Li-Ion Battery Electrodes

Zhu, Jixin, Sharma, Yogesh Kumar, Zeng, Zhiyuan, Zhang, Xiaojun, Srinivasan, Madhavi, Mhaisalkar, Subodh, Zhang, Hua, Hng, Huey Hoon, Yan, Qingyu·2011·The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Abstract

A facile chemical approach has been developed to produce nanohybrids with ultrathin Co oxides nanowall arrays on reduced graphene oxide (rGO) sheets. The Co oxides exhibited porous structure. The porosity of the Co oxide/rGO nanohybrids and the grain size of the Co oxides could be tailored by varying the annealing temperature, which directly affected their performance as Li-ion battery electrodes. When tested as anode materials for Li-ion batteries, these Co oxide/rGO nanohybrids showed structural-process-dependent performances. For example, Co 3 O 4 /rGO hybrids obtained by annealing α-Co(OH) 2 /rGO at 350 °C showed a high specific capacity of 673 mAh g −1 after 100 cycles at a discharge current density of 180 mA g −1 (0.2 C), which was better than Co 3 O 4 /rGO samples obtained at other annealing temperatures. Similarly, CoO/rGO hybrids obtained by pyrolysis of α-Co(OH) 2 /rGO at 350 °C showed optimum performance, as compared to that of CoO/rGO samples obtained at other annealing temperatures, with a capacity of 732 mAh g −1 after 100 cycles at a discharge current density of 150 mA g −1 (0.2 C). Although many metal oxide/rGO hybrid systems have been investigated as electrode materials for Li-ion batteries, this study indicates that optimization of such nanohybrids by adjusting the phases, grain sizes, and porosities is necessary to achieve ideal Li storage performances.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp2002113

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 206

Metadata

Authors
Zhu, J., Sharma, Y. K., Zeng, Z., Zhang, X., Srinivasan, M., Mhaisalkar, S., Zhang, H., Hng, H. H., & Yan, Q.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2011-04-01
Volume
115
Issue
16
Pages
8400-8406
ISSN
  • 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-7455
OpenAlex
W2157246706
Cited by
206
References
2
FWCI
24.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cobalt Oxide Nanowall Arrays on Reduced Graphene Oxide Sheets with Controlled Phase, Grain Size, and Porosity for Li-Ion Battery Electrodes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp2002113
The paper
Zhu, J., Sharma, Y. K., Zeng, Z., Zhang, X., Srinivasan, M., Mhaisalkar, S., Zhang, H., Hng, H. H., & Yan, Q. (2011). Cobalt Oxide Nanowall Arrays on Reduced Graphene Oxide Sheets with Controlled Phase, Grain Size, and Porosity for Li-Ion Battery Electrodes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp2002113

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.