The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of Cation−Anion Interaction Strength in Ionic Liquids
Abstract
Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry with variable collision induced dissociation of the isolated [(cation)(2)anion](+) and/or [(anion)(2)cation](-) ions of imidazolium-, pyridinium-, pyrrolidinium-, and piperidinium-based ionic liquids (ILs) combined with a large set of anions, such as chloride, tetrafluoroborate, hexafluorophosphate, trifluoromethanesulfonate, and bis[(trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl]imide, was used to carry out a systematic and comprehensive study on the ionic liquids relative interaction energies. The results are interpreted in terms of main influences derived from the structural characteristics of both anion and cation. On the basis of quantum chemical calculations, the effect of the anion upon the dissociation energies of the ionic liquid pair, and isolated [(cation)(2)anion](+) and/or [(anion)(2)cation](-) aggregates, were estimated and are in good agreement with the experimental data. Both experimental and computational results indicate an energetic differentiation between the cation and the anion to the ionic pair. Moreover, it was found that the quantum chemical calculations can describe the trend obtained for the electrostatic cation-anion attraction potential. The impact of the cation-anion interaction strengths in the surface tension of ionic liquids is further discussed. The surface tensions dependence on the cation alkyl chain length, and on the anion nature, follows an analogous pattern to that of the relative cation-anion interaction energies determined by mass spectrometry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Applications of ionic liquids in the chemical industry
Plechkova, N. V., & Seddon, K. R. (2008) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/b006677j · Cited by 5,686
Cited by
Ionic liquid processing of cellulose
Wang, H., Gurau, G., & Rogers, R. D. (2012) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs15311d · Cited by 1,369
Zhang, S., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., & Deng, Y. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00509 · Cited by 659
Sen, S., Martin, J. D., & Argyropoulos, D. S. (2013) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/sc400085a · Cited by 302
Metadata
- Authors
- Fernandes, A. M., Rocha, M. A. A., Freire, M. G., Marrucho, I. M., Coutinho, J. A. P., & Santos, L. M. N. B. F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-03-22
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 4033-4041
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W1979769822
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of Cation−Anion Interaction Strength in Ionic Liquids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp201084x
- The paper
- Fernandes, A. M., Rocha, M. A. A., Freire, M. G., Marrucho, I. M., Coutinho, J. A. P., & Santos, L. M. N. B. F. (2011). Evaluation of Cation−Anion Interaction Strength in Ionic Liquids. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp201084x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.