Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 280

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Full Compositional Flexibility in the Preparation of Mesoporous MFI Zeolites by Desilication

Open access
Verboekend, Danny, Mitchell, Sharon, Milina, Maria, Groen, Johan C., Pérez-Ramírez, Javier·2011·The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Abstract

We demonstrate that desilication in alkaline medium is a suitable post-synthetic method to introduce intracrystalline mesoporosity in MFI zeolites independent of the Si/Al ratio in the parent material. By systematic screening of the influence of both base concentration (0.1–1.8 M NaOH) and Si/Al ratio (10–1000) on the properties of the treated zeolites, we reveal that effective mesoporosity introduction (>200 m 2 g –1 ) may be achieved in the Si/Al range of 12–200. The use of descriptors like the “indexed hierarchy factor” and the “desilication efficiency” enable the rational categorization of the solids obtained. The highest desilication efficiencies, estimated by correlating the introduced mesoporosity with the yields after NaOH treatment, are obtained in the previously established Si/Al range of 25–50. We identify the crucial role of a subsequent acid treatment for removing amorphous Al-rich debris from alkaline-treated samples in the case of low Si/Al ratios (<20). The latter acid wash uncovers the complete micro- and mesopore network, enabling full compositional flexibility of desilication. The removal of these debris concomitantly enabled restoration of both the acidity and the chemical composition of the hierarchical zeolite to that of the starting (purely microporous) zeolite. Catalytic evaluation of selected Al-rich zeolites in the alkylation of toluene with benzyl alcohol, confirmed the superiority of the mesoporous alkaline-treated samples with respect to the parent material. Hierarchical ZSM-5 after acid washing stands as the most active sample, which stresses the relevance of the additional post-synthetic treatment step.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp201671s

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Cited by

See all 280

Metadata

Authors
Verboekend, D., Mitchell, S., Milina, M., Groen, J. C., & Pérez-Ramírez, J.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2011-06-29
Volume
115
Issue
29
Pages
14193-14203
ISSN
  • 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-7455
OpenAlex
W4240121829
Cited by
280
References
41
FWCI
9.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Full Compositional Flexibility in the Preparation of Mesoporous MFI Zeolites by Desilication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp201671s
The paper
Verboekend, D., Mitchell, S., Milina, M., Groen, J. C., & Pérez-Ramírez, J. (2011). Full Compositional Flexibility in the Preparation of Mesoporous MFI Zeolites by Desilication. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp201671s

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.