The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors in the Metal Doping of BiVO4 for Improved Photoelectrocatalytic Activity as Studied by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy and First-Principles Density-Functional Calculation
Abstract
Metal doping of the metal oxide photoelectrocatalyst, BiVO 4, dramatically increases its activity for water oxidation. Scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM) was used to screen various dopants for their photoelectrochemical performance and to optimize the used dopant material concentrations with this photocatalyst. For example, adding Mo to W-doped BiVO 4 enhanced the performance. The photocatalytic activity was examined on larger electrodes by means of photoelectrochemical and electrochemical measurements. The developed photoelectrocatalyst, W- and Mo-doped BiVO 4, shows a photocurrent for water oxidation that is more than 10 times higher than undoped BiVO 4 . Factors that affect performance are discussed, and enhanced separation of excited electron–hole pairs by doping onto the semiconductor is suggested by first-principles density-functional theory (DFT) calculations. Distortion of the crystal structure of monoclinic scheelite-like BiVO 4 by addition of W and Mo doping predicted by DFT is also revealed by X-ray diffraction and Rietveld refinement analysis. The results indicate that the consecutive doping of W and Mo into the metal oxide photocatalyst introduces improved electron–hole separation without a significant change of the band gap or the material's optical properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Projector augmented-wave method
Blöchl, P. E. (1994) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.50.17953 · Cited by 92,732
Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations
Monkhorst, H. J., & Pack, J. D. (1976) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.13.5188 · Cited by 71,721
Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode
FUJISHIMA, A., & HONDA, K. (1972) · Nature · doi:10.1038/238037a0 · Cited by 34,169
Cited by
Advanced Nanoarchitectures for Solar Photocatalytic Applications
Kubacka, A., Fernández-García, M., & Colón, G. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr100454n · Cited by 2,373
Tan, H. L., Amal, R., & Ng, Y. H. (2017) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c7ta04441k · Cited by 459
Wygant, B. R., Kawashima, K., & Mullins, C. B. (2018) · ACS Energy Letters · doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.8b01774 · Cited by 435
McDonald, K. J., & Choi, K.-S. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee22608a · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Park, H. S., Kweon, K. E., Ye, H., Paek, E., Hwang, G. S., & Bard, A. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-08-23
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 36
- Pages
- 17870-17879
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2315931306
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors in the Metal Doping of BiVO4 for Improved Photoelectrocatalytic Activity as Studied by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy and First-Principles Density-Functional Calculation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp204492r
- The paper
- Park, H. S., Kweon, K. E., Ye, H., Paek, E., Hwang, G. S., & Bard, A. J. (2011). Factors in the Metal Doping of BiVO4 for Improved Photoelectrocatalytic Activity as Studied by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy and First-Principles Density-Functional Calculation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp204492r
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.