Cited by 11Advanced Chemical Physics StudiesAdvanced Physical and Chemical Molecular InteractionsPhysical Organic Chemistry and Reaction Kinetics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ab Initio Benchmark Calculations on Ca(II) Complexes and Assessment of Density Functional Theory Methodologies

Open access
Suárez, Dimas, Rayón, Víctor M., Díaz, Natalia, Valdés, Haydée·2011·The Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Abstract

A set of benchmark results for the geometries, binding energies, and protonation affinities of 24 complexes of small organic ligands with Ca(II) is provided. The chosen level of theory is CCSD(T)/CBS obtained by means of a composite procedure. The performance of four density functionals, namely, PW91, PBE, B3LYP, and TPSS and several Pople-type basis sets, namely, 6-31G(d), 6-31+G(d), 6-31+G(2d,p) and 6-311+G(d) have been assessed. Additionally, the nature of the metal ligand bonding has been analyzed by means of the Symmetry Adapted Perturbation Theory (SAPT). We have found that the B3LYP hybrid functional, in conjunction with either the polarized double-ζ 6-31+G(2d,p) or the triple-ζ 6-311+G(d) basis sets, yields the closest results compared to the benchmark data. The SAPT analysis stresses the importance of induction effects in the binding of these complexes and suggests that consideration of classical electrostatic contributions alone may not be reliable enough for the prediction of relative binding energies for Ca(II) complexes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp205101z

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 75 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Grimme S., 2011, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci., 1, 211
  2. Cieplak P., 2009, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 21, 333102
  3. Iron M. A., 2003, Mol. Phys., 101
  4. Frisch M. J., 2004, Gaussian 03

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Suárez, D., Rayón, V. M., Díaz, N., & Valdés, H.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Oviedo (ES)
  • Universidad de Valladolid (ES)
Corresponding author
Valdés, Haydée
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
Published
2011-09-28
Volume
115
Issue
41
Pages
11331-11343
ISSN
  • 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5215
OpenAlex
W2321454992
Cited by
11
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Consultation of the Doctoral Thesis Database (TESEO) (Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Physical Organic Chemistry and Reaction Kinetics
Keywords
calcium(II) complexes, metal-ligand binding, density functional benchmarking, B3LYP, CCSD(T)/CBS, basis set effects, binding energy, symmetry-adapted perturbation theory, induction effects, electrostatic interactions, organic ligands
MeSH terms
Calcium, Hydroxides, Organometallic Compounds, Quantum Theory, Thermodynamics, Water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review