The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanistic Discussion of the Oxygen Reduction Reaction at Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Nanotubes
Abstract
The oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) at undoped and nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes (CNTs and N-CNTs, respectively) was studied by cyclic voltammety, rotating disk electrode voltammetry, and gasometric analysis in neutral and alkaline aqueous solutions. At undoped CNTs, the ORR proceeds by two successive two-electron processes with hydroperoxide (HO 2 – ) as the intermediate. At N-CNTs, the ORR occurs through a “pseudo”-four-electron pathway involving a catalytic regenerative process in which hydroperoxide is chemically disproportionated to form hydroxide (OH – ) and molecular oxygen (O 2 ). The ORR mechanism at both undoped and N-doped varieties is supported by steady state polarization and gasometric measurements of hydroperoxide disproportionation rates. An enhancement of over 1000-fold for hydroperoxide disproportionation is observed for N-CNTs, with rates comparable to the best known peroxide decomposition catalysts. A positive correlation between nitrogen content and ORR activities is observed where the ORR potential shifts by up to 11.6 mV per at. % N incorporated into the N-CNTs and exhibits an oxygen reduction potential, E p, of −0.23 V vs Hg/Hg 2 SO 4 (+0.640 V vs NHE) in 1 M Na 2 HPO 4 for N-CNTs containing 7.4 at. % N. A detailed mechanism is proposed that involves a dual site reduction in which O 2 is initially reduced at a N–C type site in a 2-electron process to form HO 2 –, which then can undergo either further electrochemical reduction to form OH – species or chemical disproportionation to form OH – species and molecular O 2 at a decorating Fe x O y /Fe surface phase.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
High-Performance Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Derived from Polyaniline, Iron, and Cobalt
Wu, G., More, K. L., Johnston, C. M., & Zelenay, P. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1200832 · Cited by 3,984
Cited by
Metal-Free Catalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction
Dai, L., Xue, Y., Qu, L., Choi, H.-J., & Baek, J.-B. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr5003563 · Cited by 2,380
Oxygen Reduction in Alkaline Media: From Mechanisms to Recent Advances of Catalysts
Ge, X., Sumboja, A., Wuu, D., An, T., Li, B., Goh, F. W. T., Hor, T. S. A., Zong, Y., & Liu, Z. (2015) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.5b00524 · Cited by 1,341
Heterogeneous nanocarbon materials for oxygen reduction reaction
Wang, D.-W., & Su, D. (2014) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c3ee43463j · Cited by 1,018
Chen, D., Chen, C., Baiyee, Z. M., Shao, Z., & Ciucci, F. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00073 · Cited by 936
Wu, G., Santandreu, A., Kellogg, W., Gupta, S., Ogoke, O., Zhang, H., Wang, H.-L., & Dai, L. (2016) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.12.032 · Cited by 744
Metadata
- Authors
- Wiggins-Camacho, J. D., & Stevenson, K. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-09-21
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 40
- Pages
- 20002-20010
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2332574316
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.