Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 167

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Understanding CO2 Adsorption in CuBTC MOF: Comparing Combined DFT–ab Initio Calculations with Microcalorimetry Experiments

Grajciar, Lukáš, Wiersum, Andrew D., Llewellyn, Philip L., Chang, Jong-San, Nachtigall, Petr·2011·The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Abstract

A combined experimental and theoretical investigation of CO 2 adsorption in the metal–organic framework CuBTC is presented. Adsorption enthalpies were measured as a function of coverage up to 13 mmol g –1 adsorbed amount (corresponding roughly to CO 2 /Cu = 5:2) by a Tian–Calvet-type microcalorimeter. Experimetal data are interpreted based on accurate calculations employing a combined DFT–ab initio computational scheme. CO 2 molecules adsorb preferentially on coordinatively unsaturated sites for coverages below CO 2 /Cu = 1:1; at higher coverages (up to CO 2 /Cu = 5:3), CO 2 adsorbs in cage window sites; and at higher coverages, the sites in cage centers and in large cages start to be occupied. Experimental adsorption enthalpies are almost constant (−29 kJ mol –1 ) up to the CO 2 /Cu = 5:3 coverage, suggesting a homogeneity of adsorption sites. However, calculations clearly show that adsorption sites in CuBTC are rather heterogeneous. The experimentally observed independence of adsorption enthalpies with respect to coverage is due to the cancellation of two effects: the decrease in the adsorbate–adsorbent interaction is compensated by an increase in the lateral interactions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp206002d

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 167

Metadata

Authors
Grajciar, L., Wiersum, A. D., Llewellyn, P. L., Chang, J.-S., & Nachtigall, P.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2011-08-18
Volume
115
Issue
36
Pages
17925-17933
ISSN
  • 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-7455
OpenAlex
W2322229116
Cited by
167
References
1
FWCI
9.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.