Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 243

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

TiO2–Graphene Nanocomposite as High Performace Photocatalysts

Štengl, Václav, Popelková, Daniela, Vláčil, Petr·2011·The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Abstract

Nonstoichiometric TiO 2 –graphene nanocomposite was prepared by thermal hydrolysis of suspension with graphene nanosheets and titania–peroxo complex. The characterization of graphene nanosheets was provided by using an atomic force microscope (AFM). The prepared samples were characterized by Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area and Barrett–Joiner–Halenda porosity (BJH), X-ray diffraction (XRD), infrared spectroscopy (IR), Raman spectroscopy (RS), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). UV/vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy was employed to estimate band gap energies. From the titania/graphene samples, a 300 μm thin layer on a piece of glass 10 × 15 cm was created. The photocatalytic activity of the prepared layers was assessed from the kinetics of the photocatalytic degradation of butane in the gas phase. With regard to the degree of mineralization of butane, the sample labeled TiPC0100 and containing 0.1 g of graphene nanosheets then can be considered as the most active sample.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp207515z

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Štengl, V., Popelková, D., & Vláčil, P.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2011-12-07
Volume
115
Issue
51
Pages
25209-25218
ISSN
  • 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-7455
OpenAlex
W2331178965
Cited by
243
References
3
FWCI
9.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.