The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
LIPID11: A Modular Framework for Lipid Simulations Using Amber
Open accessAbstract
Accurate simulation of complex lipid bilayers has long been a goal in condensed phase molecular dynamics (MD). Structure and function of membrane-bound proteins are highly dependent on the lipid bilayer environment and are challenging to study through experimental methods. Within Amber, there has been limited focus on lipid simulations, although some success has been seen with the use of the General Amber Force Field (GAFF). However, to date there are no dedicated Amber lipid force fields. In this paper we describe a new charge derivation strategy for lipids consistent with the Amber RESP approach and a new atom and residue naming and type convention. In the first instance, we have combined this approach with GAFF parameters. The result is LIPID11, a flexible, modular framework for the simulation of lipids that is fully compatible with the existing Amber force fields. The charge derivation procedure, capping strategy, and nomenclature for LIPID11, along with preliminary simulation results and a discussion of the planned long-term parameter development are presented here. Our findings suggest that LIPID11 is a modular framework feasible for phospholipids and a flexible starting point for the development of a comprehensive, Amber-compatible lipid force field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Amber biomolecular simulation programs
Case, D. A., Cheatham, T. E., Darden, T., Gohlke, H., Luo, R., Merz, K. M., Onufriev, A., Simmerling, C., Wang, B., & Woods, R. J. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20290 · Cited by 9,535
Cited by
Salomon-Ferrer, R., Götz, A. W., Poole, D., Le Grand, S., & Walker, R. C. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct400314y · Cited by 3,372
Self-citationAn overview of the Amber biomolecular simulation package
Salomon‐Ferrer, R., Case, D. A., & Walker, R. C. (2013) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1121 · Cited by 2,623
Self-citationLipid14: The Amber Lipid Force Field
Dickson, C. J., Madej, B. D., Skjevik, Å. A., Betz, R. M., Teigen, K., Gould, I. R., & Walker, R. C. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct4010307 · Cited by 1,206
Self-citationJo, S., Cheng, X., Islam, S. M., Huang, L., Rui, H., Zhu, A., Lee, H. S., Qi, Y., Han, W., Vanommeslaeghe, K., et al. (2014) · Advances in Protein Chemistry and Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/bs.apcsb.2014.06.002 · Cited by 363
Muller, M. P., Jiang, T., Sun, C., Lihan, M., Pant, S., Mahinthichaichan, P., Trifan, A., & Tajkhorshid, E. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00608 · Cited by 282
Structure–Function Insights into Direct Lipid Transfer between Membranes by Mmm1–Mdm12 of ERMES
Kawano, S., Tamura, Y., Kojima, R., Bala, S., Asai, E., Michel, A. H., Kornmann, B., Riezman, I., Riezman, H., Sakae, Y., et al. (2018) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201704119 · Cited by 148
“The force fields were AMB ER ff99SB (Hornak et al., 2006), Lipid11 (Skjevik et al., 2012), and TIP3P water model (Jorgensen et al., 1983) for Mdm12, POPC, and explicit water molecules, respectively.”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Skjevik, Å. A., Madej, B. D., Walker, R. C., & Teigen, K.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-09-04
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 36
- Pages
- 11124-11136
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W2164405854
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.