Cited by 12Origins and Evolution of LifeAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical MechanicsEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

Creation and Persistence of Chiral Asymmetry in a Microscopically Reversible Molecular Model

Ricci, Francesco, Stillinger, Frank H., Debenedetti, Pablo G.·2013·The Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Abstract

Of the numerous mechanisms that have been postulated to explain the origin of biological homochirality, asymmetric autocatalysis coupled with mutual inhibition is often cited as a plausible route to abiotic symmetry breaking. However, in a system closed to mass flow, the constraint of microscopic reversibility ensures that this far-from-equilibrium phenomenon can at best provide a temporary excursion from racemic equilibrium. Comparatively little attention has been paid in the literature to the manner in which such a closed system approaches equilibrium, examining the mechanisms and time scales involved in its transit. We use an elementary lattice model with molecular degrees of freedom, and satisfying microscopic reversibility, to investigate the temporal evolution of stochastic symmetry breaking in a closed system. Numerical investigation of the model's behavior identified conditions under which the system's evolution toward racemic equilibrium becomes extremely slow, allowing for long-time persistence of a symmetry-broken state. Strong mutual inhibition between enantiomers facilitates a "monomer purification" mechanism, in which molecules of the minor enantiomer are rapidly sequestered and a nearly homochiral state persists for long times, even in the presence of significant reverse reaction rates. Simple order of magnitude estimates show that with reasonable physical parameters a symmetry-broken state could persist over geologically relevant time scales.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp3093644

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In absence of boundary conditions, systems equilibrate and deviation from racemic state is lost.

    “It is important to note that in the absence of these boundary conditions, systems will be able to equilibrate with their surrounding and the deviation from the racemic state will be lost, e.g.racemization would occur under classically employed reaction workups operated in solution.41,352”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ricci, F., Stillinger, F. H., & Debenedetti, P. G.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Debenedetti, Pablo G.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
2013-01-07
Volume
117
Issue
2
Pages
602-614
ISSN
  • 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6106
OpenAlex
W2317148090
Cited by
12
References
10
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
origin of homochirality, chiral symmetry breaking, microscopic reversibility, autocatalysis, reciprocal inhibition, enantiomers, closed systems, monomer purification, stochastic dynamics, lattice model
MeSH terms
Models, Molecular, Stereoisomerism, Temperature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review