Identifying Promising Zeolite Frameworks for Separation Applications: A Building-Block-Based Approach
Abstract
The concept of natural tilings provides a unique definition of the building blocks that constitute zeolite frameworks. Knowledge of the natural tiling permits the identification of different frameworks with similar structural properties. On the basis of results from earlier work, which showed a close association between energetically preferred carbon dioxide adsorption sites and certain structural building units, we propose a list of criteria to identify natural tiles that could lead to a high affinity of a zeolite framework toward CO 2 . After identifying all recognized framework types that incorporate tiles with these features, we perform grand-canonical Monte Carlo simulations of CO 2 adsorption and CO 2 /N 2 mixture adsorption in these structures. Out of a set of 37 frameworks, we identify eight systems that exhibit relatively high CO 2 /N 2 adsorption selectivities and CO 2 working capacities. An inspection of the natural tilings of these systems reveals that they contain a relatively limited number of natural tiles, most of which occur in several of the eight systems. A subsequent analysis of the CO 2 adsorption sites shows that identical tiles usually afford adsorption sites with very similar geometries and adsorption energies, highlighting the connection between the presence of certain tiles and the material’s affinity for carbon dioxide. While the results are not directly transferable to real-world applications, this study demonstrates that an analysis of the natural tiling permits the judicious choice of candidate topologies that are particularly promising for a given task, provided that some initial information on the relationship between the structural features and the property in question is available. Similar approaches can be imagined for various applications in adsorption and catalysis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Separation of CO2 from N2 has been studied on activated and microporous carbons, graphene-based materials, MOFs, amine-functionalized adsorbents, metal oxides and carbonates, zeolites, AlPOs, and SAPOs.
“The separation of CO2 from N2 has been studied on different adsorbents, including activated and microporous carbons, graphene-based materials, MOFs, amine-functionalized adsorbents, metal oxides and carbonates, zeolites, AlPOs, and SAPOs,331−333,543,545−550”
From Zeolites in Adsorption Processes: State of the Art and Future Prospects (2022) · cites this paper as [332]
Cites
Purification of Hydrogen by Pressure Swing Adsorption
SIRCAR, S., & GOLDEN, T. C. (2000) · Separation Science and Technology · doi:10.1081/ss-100100183 · Cited by 570 · see citing works
Reducing the Cost of CO <sub>2</sub> Capture from Flue Gases Using Pressure Swing Adsorption
Ho, M. T., Allinson, G. W., & Wiley, D. E. (2008) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie070831e · Cited by 566 · see citing works
Alkali and alkaline-earth cation exchanged chabazite zeolites for adsorption based CO2 capture
Zhang, J., Singh, R., & Webley, P. A. (2008) · Microporous and Mesoporous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2007.08.022 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Adsorption equilibria and kinetics of CO2, CH4 and N2 in natural zeolites
Hernández-Huesca, R., Dı́az, L., & Aguilar-Armenta, G. (1999) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/s1383-5866(98)00094-x · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Palomino, M., Corma, A., Jordá, J. L., Rey, F., & Valencia, S. (2012) · Chem. Commun. · doi:10.1039/c1cc16320e · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zeolites in Adsorption Processes: State of the Art and Future Prospects
Pérez-Botella, E., Valencia, S., & Rey, F. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00140 · Cited by 1,126 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fischer, M., & Bell, R. G.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Bell, Robert G.
- ORCID
- Fischer, Michael
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-08-09
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 33
- Pages
- 17099-17110
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2024082542
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Thomas Young Centre
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
- Keywords
- zeolite structure, building blocks, CO2 adsorption, CO2/N2 separation, adsorption selectivity, grand canonical Monte Carlo simulation, framework topology, CO2 capture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review