The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reduction of Carbonate Electrolytes and the Formation of Solid-Electrolyte Interface (SEI) in Lithium-Ion Batteries. 1. Spectroscopic Observations of Radical Intermediates Generated in One-Electron Reduction of Carbonates
Abstract
Whereas there are numerous experimental and computational studies of electrochemical reduction leading to the formation of solid-electrolyte interface (SEI) in lithium-ion batteries, so far there have been no direct spectroscopic observations of radical intermediates involved in the SEI formation. In Part 1 of this series, radiolysis and laser photoionization of carbonate electrolytes are used to observe and identify these reaction intermediates using electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. Our study indicates that the suggested scenarios for electrolyte reduction require elaboration. In particular, we establish the occurrence of efficient H abstraction and 1,2-migration involving radicals generated through the reductive ring-opening. Instead of the primary radicals postulated in the current models, secondary and tertiary radicals are generated, biasing the subsequent chemistry to radical disproportionation. The consequences of this bias for radical and anionic polymerization are examined, and it is suggested that branching and the formation of a polymer network is favored. We argue that this chemistry accounts for some of the heretofore unexplained properties of SEI, including the dramatic difference in solvent permeability for SEIs derived from ethylene carbonate and propylene carbonate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reactive Applications of Cyclic Alkylene Carbonates
Clements, J. H. (2003) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie020678i · Cited by 784
Cited by
Electrolytes and Interphases in Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
Xu, K. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500003w · Cited by 5,566
Review on modeling of the anode solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) for lithium-ion batteries
Wang, A., Kadam, S., Li, H., Shi, S., & Qi, Y. (2018) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-018-0064-0 · Cited by 1,639
Electrode–electrolyte interfaces in lithium-based batteries
Yu, X., & Manthiram, A. (2018) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c7ee02555f · Cited by 649
In situ polymerization process: an essential design tool for lithium polymer batteries
Vijayakumar, V., Anothumakkool, B., Kurungot, S., Winter, M., & Nair, J. R. (2021) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d0ee03527k · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Shkrob, I. A., Zhu, Y., Marin, T. W., & Abraham, D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-09-26
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 38
- Pages
- 19255-19269
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2313366011
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.