The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular Dynamics Study on Nanoparticle Diffusion in Polymer Melts: A Test of the Stokes−Einstein Law
Abstract
Molecular dynamics simulations are used to investigate the diffusion process of nanoparticles in polymer melts. The effects of size, concentration, and mass of the particle, chain length, and polymer−particle interaction on the diffusion of particles in polymer melts are also explored. Our simulated results indicate that the gyration radius of the polymer chain is the key factor determining the validity of the Stokes−Eintsein(SE) relation in describing the particle diffusion at infinite dilution. When the particle size is larger than the gyration radius of the polymer chain, the SE formula can predict the particle diffusion in the polymer melts correctly, and the particle diffusion does not show mass dependence. When the particle size is smaller than the gyration radius of the polymer chain, however, the SE equation becomes invalid in the prediction of particle diffusion, because particle diffusion is exactly related to the nanoviscosity rather than the macroviscosity used in the SE formula. Furthermore, it is also found that the diffusion coefficient of the particle is inversely proportional to the cube of its hydrodynamic radius. In this regime where the particle size is smaller than the gyration radius of the polymer, particle diffusion is independent of the chain length or molecular weight of the polymer, but dependent on the particle mass. In addition, we also observe the transition process of the particle experiencing macroviscosity to nanoviscosity of the polymer melts by gradually increasing the chain length. The concentration dependence of the particle diffusion is similar to the results from Heyes et al., and at high volume fractions, the negative deviations from the SE formula are found. By exploring the effect of particle−polymer interaction on the diffusion of the particle larger than the gyration radius of the polymer chain, it is found that the condition where the SE formula becomes valid in the prediction of the particle diffusion is that where different reasonably defined effective hydrodynamic radii must be used.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short-Range Molecular Dynamics
Plimpton, S. (1995) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 · Cited by 44,721
Computer Simulation of Liquids
Allen, M. P., & Tildesley, D. J. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198803195.001.0001 · Cited by 20,945
Dynamics of entangled linear polymer melts: A molecular-dynamics simulation
Kremer, K., & Grest, G. S. (1990) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.458541 · Cited by 4,023
Rheology and structural changes of polymer melts via nonequilibrium molecular dynamics
Kröger, M., Loose, W., & Hess, S. (1993) · Journal of Rheology · doi:10.1122/1.550409 · Cited by 230
Cited by
Liu, J., Gao, Y., Cao, D., Zhang, L., & Guo, Z. (2011) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la201073m · Cited by 373
Self-citation(2025) · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-65270-5 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, J., Cao, D., & Zhang, L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-04-05
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 6653-6661
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2017182404
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.