The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nature of the Catalytic Centers of Porphyrin-Based Electrocatalysts for the ORR: A Correlation of Kinetic Current Density with the Site Density of Fe−N4 Centers
Abstract
In this work, it has been shown that structural changes of an as-prepared catalyst enable the assignment of the catalytic centers responsible for the direct and indirect oxygen reduction reaction, respectively, of porphyrin-based electrocatalysts. An iron porphyrin (FeTMPPCl)-based catalyst as well as a catalyst based on H 2 TMPP were prepared using the so-called foaming agent technique (FAT). The obtained iron catalyst was used as a generic material for the post-treatments. Structural changes were analyzed by 57 Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy. The catalytic activity toward the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) was determined using rotating (ring) disc electrode (R(R)DE) experiments. The catalysts exhibit a variation in the iron content between 2.9 and 4.5 wt % caused by the post-treatments. It has been found that the Mössbauer spectra of all catalysts can be fitted assuming two different ferrous Fe−N 4 centers, a CFeN 2 center (Fe 2+, S = 2) and an Fe 3 C center (Fe 0 ). After the intensities found in the Mössbauer spectra were normalized relative to the iron content, a linear correlation between the kinetic current density related to the direct oxygen reduction and the amount of in-plane Fe−N 4 centers is found. Beside this, there is evidence for a correlation between the kinetic current density related to the hydrogen peroxide formation and CFeN 2 centers. Heat-treated carbon-supported iron porphyrin, prepared as reference material, exhibits the same behavior as our FAT catalysts. The correlation enables us to obtain the turnover frequencies for both the direct and the indirect oxygen reduction reaction and to determine the site densities, in which we reach a third of the target value published by Gasteiger et al. ( Appl. Catal., B 2005, 56, 9).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gasteiger, H. A., Kocha, S. S., Sompalli, B., & Wagner, F. T. (2005) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.06.021 · Cited by 4,876
Cited by
High-Performance Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Derived from Polyaniline, Iron, and Cobalt
Wu, G., More, K. L., Johnston, C. M., & Zelenay, P. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1200832 · Cited by 3,984
Recent advancements in Pt and Pt-free catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction
Nie, Y., Li, L., & Wei, Z. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00484a · Cited by 2,156
Wu, G., Santandreu, A., Kellogg, W., Gupta, S., Ogoke, O., Zhang, H., Wang, H.-L., & Dai, L. (2016) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.12.032 · Cited by 744
An, S., Zhang, G., Wang, T., Zhang, W., Li, K., Song, C., Miller, J. T., Miao, S., Wang, J., & Guo, X. (2018) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b04693 · Cited by 601
PGM‐Free Cathode Catalysts for PEM Fuel Cells: A Mini‐Review on Stability Challenges
Shao, Y., Dodelet, J., Wu, G., & Zelenay, P. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201807615 · Cited by 553
Metadata
- Authors
- Koslowski, U. I., Abs-Wurmbach, I., Fiechter, S., & Bogdanoff, P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-09-06
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 39
- Pages
- 15356-15366
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W1978636588
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.