The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Origin of the Enhanced Photocatalytic Activities of Semiconductors: A Case Study of ZnO Doped with Mg2+
Abstract
A series of Zn 1− x Mg x O samples with dopant content ranging from x = 0 to 0.10 were prepared by a novel rheological phase reaction route. All Zn 1− x Mg x O samples were investigated by X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, inductive coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy, infrared and UV−vis absorption spectroscopy, and the Barrett−Emmett−-Teller technique. The effects of Mg 2+ doping in ZnO on the electronic structures and photogradation of methylene blue dye solution were investigated experimentally and theoretically. All Zn 1− x Mg x O samples exhibit high photoactivities comparable to Degussa P-25, which first increased with the Mg doing content up to x = 0.05, and then slightly decreased with further doping of Mg to x = 0.10. Density function theory calculations revealed that the substitutions of Mg for Zn ions in the wurtzite ZnO structure largely affected the conduction band, but left the valence band nearly unchanged. The bottom of the conduction band shifted toward higher energies and the contribution of Mg 3s orbitals to the conduction band became more pronounced with increasing Mg content, which explains the enhanced photocatalytic activities. The state density of interstitial Mg in ZnO showed a set of shallow acceptor levels above the valence band. These shallow levels could act as the trapping or recombination centers for photoinduced electrons and holes, accounting for the slightly decreased photodegradation efficiency with further increasing Mg content to x = 0.10. The optimal doping content for photocatalytic performance was determined to be x = 0.05, which is the consequence of the balance of two competing doping effects from lattice substitution and interstitial occupations on the electronic structures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Shannon, R. D. (1976) · Acta Crystallographica Section A · doi:10.1107/s0567739476001551 · Cited by 66,145
Photocatalysis on TiO2 Surfaces: Principles, Mechanisms, and Selected Results
Linsebigler, A. L., Lu, G., & Yates, J. T. (1995) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr00035a013 · Cited by 11,575
Surface Science Studies of the Photoactivation of TiO 2 New Photochemical Processes
Thompson, T. L., & Yates, J. T. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr050172k · Cited by 2,064
Cited by
Zhang, H., Zong, R., & Zhu, Y. (2009) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp810748u · Cited by 428
Gnanaprakasam, A., Sivakumar, V. M., & Thirumarimurugan, M. (2015) · Indian Journal of Materials Science · doi:10.1155/2015/601827 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- Qiu, X., Li, L., Zheng, J., Liu, J., Sun, X., & Li, G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-07-19
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 32
- Pages
- 12242-12248
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2016123554
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Origin of the Enhanced Photocatalytic Activities of Semiconductors: A Case Study of ZnO Doped with Mg2+. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp803129e
- The paper
- Qiu, X., Li, L., Zheng, J., Liu, J., Sun, X., & Li, G. (2008). Origin of the Enhanced Photocatalytic Activities of Semiconductors: A Case Study of ZnO Doped with Mg2+. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp803129e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.