The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electrodeposition of α-Fe2O3 Doped with Mo or Cr as Photoanodes for Photocatalytic Water Splitting
Abstract
Electrochemical methods for the codeposition of Cr or Mo with α-Fe 2 O 3 (hematite) have been developed to produce doped iron oxide films with varying compositions of Cr and Mo which are active photoanodes for photoelectrochemical (PEC) water decomposition (“water splitting”). The films were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, UV−vis optical spectroscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy to determine the effect of the dopants on the hematite structure and PEC performance. Upon doping, the microstructures of the films varied; however, no preferred crystallographic orientation or dopant phase segregation was observed. The best performing samples were 5% Cr and 15% Mo doped which had Incident Photon Conversion Efficiencies (IPCE’s) at 400 nm of 6% and 12%, respectively, with an applied potential of 0.4V vs Ag/AgCl. These IPCE values were 2.2× and 4× higher than the undoped sample for the 5% Cr and 15% Mo samples, respectively. The increase in performance is attributed to an improvement in the charge transport properties within the films and not due to significant changes in the electrocatalytic rates due to dopants residing at the surface. The onset potential for photocurrent in all the samples was approximately −350 mV vs Ag/AgCl. The optical absorption spectra of the films showed bandgaps of approximately 2.0−2.1 eV for all samples regardless of doping.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode
FUJISHIMA, A., & HONDA, K. (1972) · Nature · doi:10.1038/238037a0 · Cited by 34,169
Photocatalysis on TiO2 Surfaces: Principles, Mechanisms, and Selected Results
Linsebigler, A. L., Lu, G., & Yates, J. T. (1995) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr00035a013 · Cited by 11,575
Cited by
Heterogeneous Photocatalysis: Recent Advances and Applications
Ibhadon, A., & Fitzpatrick, P. (2013) · Catalysts · doi:10.3390/catal3010189 · Cited by 1,409
Abe, R. (2010) · Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2011.02.003 · Cited by 1,223
Identifying champion nanostructures for solar water-splitting
Warren, S. C., Voïtchovsky, K., Dotan, H., Leroy, C. M., Cornuz, M., Stellacci, F., Hébert, C., Rothschild, A., & Grätzel, M. (2013) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3684 · Cited by 561
Metadata
- Authors
- Kleiman-Shwarsctein, A., Hu, Y.-S., Forman, A. J., Stucky, G. D., & McFarland, E. W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-09-13
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 40
- Pages
- 15900-15907
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2090976499
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.