The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer in Solution, Proteins, and Electrochemistry
Open accessAbstract
Recent advances in the theoretical treatment of proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) reactions are reviewed. These reactions play an important role in a wide range of biological processes, as well as in fuel cells, solar cells, chemical sensors, and electrochemical devices. A unified theoretical framework has been developed to describe both sequential and concerted PCET, as well as hydrogen atom transfer (HAT). A quantitative diagnostic has been proposed to differentiate between HAT and PCET in terms of the degree of electronic nonadiabaticity, where HAT corresponds to electronically adiabatic proton transfer and PCET corresponds to electronically nonadiabatic proton transfer. In both cases, the overall reaction is typically vibronically nonadiabatic. A series of rate constant expressions have been derived in various limits by describing the PCET reactions in terms of nonadiabatic transitions between electron-proton vibronic states. These expressions account for the solvent response to both electron and proton transfer and the effects of the proton donor-acceptor vibrational motion. The solvent and protein environment can be represented by a dielectric continuum or described with explicit molecular dynamics. These theoretical treatments have been applied to numerous PCET reactions in solution and proteins. Expressions for heterogeneous rate constants and current densities for electrochemical PCET have also been derived and applied to model systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Proton-coupled electron transfer
Huynh, M. H. V., & Meyer, T. J. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr0500030 · Cited by 1,659
Stubbe, J., Nocera, D. G., Yee, C. S., & Chang, M. C. Y. (2003) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr020421u · Cited by 823
Cited by
Theory of Coupled Electron and Proton Transfer Reactions
Hammes-Schiffer, S., & Stuchebrukhov, A. A. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr1001436 · Cited by 848
Self-citationUsing coherence to enhance function in chemical and biophysical systems
Scholes, G. D., Fleming, G. R., Chen, L. X., Aspuru-Guzik, A., Buchleitner, A., Coker, D. F., Engel, G. S., van Grondelle, R., Ishizaki, A., Jonas, D. M., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21425 · Cited by 668
Electrochemistry of redox-active self-assembled monolayers
Eckermann, A. L., Feld, D. J., Shaw, J. A., & Meade, T. J. (2010) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.023 · Cited by 607
Electrocatalysis in Alkaline Media and Alkaline Membrane-Based Energy Technologies
Yang, Y., Peltier, C. R., Zeng, R., Schimmenti, R., Li, Q., Huang, X., Yan, Z., Potsi, G., Selhorst, R., Lu, X., et al. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00331 · Cited by 544
Self-citationProton-Coupled Electron Transfer: Moving Together and Charging Forward
Hammes-Schiffer, S. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.5b04087 · Cited by 468
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hammes-Schiffer, S., & Soudackov, A. V.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-10-09
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 45
- Pages
- 14108-14123
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W1996408951
- Cited by
- 430
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.