Cited by 170Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic CompoundsAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesOrganic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions

Aromaticity and Antiaromaticity in the Low-Lying Electronic States of Cyclooctatetraene

Karadakov, Peter B.·2008·The Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Abstract

The levels of aromaticity of the most important geometries on the ground-state (S(0)), lowest triplet-state (T(1)), and first singlet excited-state (S(1)) potential energy surfaces (PESs) for cycloocta-1,3,5,7-tetraene (COT) are assessed using a wide range of magnetic criteria including nucleus-independent chemical shifts (NICSs), proton shieldings, and magnetic susceptibilities calculated using complete-active-space self-consistent-field (CASSCF) wave functions constructed from gauge-including atomic orbitals (GIAOs). It is shown that the ground state of D(8h) COT (transition state for the pi-bond-shift process on the S(0) PES) is markedly antiaromatic, even more so than the classical example of an antiaromatic system, the ground state of square cyclobutadiene. The CASSCF-GIAO magnetic properties of the ground state of D(4h) COT (transition state for the ring-inversion process on the S(0) PES) strongly suggest that it is much less antiaromatic than the ground state of D(8h) COT, whereas those of the ground state of D(2d) COT (local minimum on the S(0) PES) indicate that it is decidedly nonaromatic. The lowest triplet state and the first singlet excited state of D(8h) COT (local minima on the T(1) PES and the S(1) PES, respectively) exhibit surprisingly similar magnetic properties. These, in turn, are very close to the magnetic properties of benzene, which is a strong indication of a high degree of aromaticity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp8067365

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Karadakov showed in 2008 that Baird's rule also applies to the first excited singlet state, studying magnetic shielding of S1 benzene, square cyclobutadiene, and D8h cyclooctatetraene.

    “In 2008, Karadakov showed that the rule also applies to the first excited singlet state, studying the magnetic shielding of S 1 benzene [193], square cyclobutadiene [193], and D 8h cyclooctatetraene (COT) [194].”

    From Aromaticity and Antiaromaticity: How to Define Them (2025) · cites this paper as [194]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karadakov, P. B.
Affiliations
University of York (GB)
Corresponding author
Karadakov, Peter B.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
Published
2008-11-13
Volume
112
Issue
49
Pages
12707-12713
ISSN
  • 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5215
OpenAlex
W1998648411
Cited by
170
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Organic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions
Keywords
cyclooctatetraene, aromaticity, antiaromaticity, low-lying electronic states, potential energy surface, nucleus-independent chemical shift, magnetic properties, CASSCF, gauge-including atomic orbitals, ring inversion, triplet state, singlet excited state, benzene comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review