The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Charge Separation in the Aerodynamic Breakup of Micrometer-Sized Water Droplets
Abstract
Charged water droplets generated by electrospray, sonic spray, and a vibrating orifice aerosol generator (VOAG) have been studied by digital macrophotography and image charge detection mass spectrometry. Image charge detection mass spectrometry provides information on the droplet size, charge, and velocity after transmission through a capillary interface. The digital images provide the droplet size distribution before they enter the capillary. Droplets with 10-100 microm radii generated by sonic spray and VOAG are reduced to 2-3 microm radii by transmission through the capillary interface. The droplets from sonic spray and VOAG are much more highly charged than expected for random charging, and positive droplets are much more prevalent than negative. For positive mode electrospray, >99% of the detected droplets carry a positive charge, whereas for negative mode electrospray, <30% of the detected droplets carry a negative charge (i.e., >70% carry a positive charge). These observation can all be accounted for by the aerodynamic breakup of the droplets in the capillary interface. This breakup reduces the droplets to a terminal size at which point further breakup does not occur. Charge separation during droplet breakup is responsible for the relatively high charges on the sonic spray and VOAG droplets and for the preference for positively charged droplets. The charge separation can be explained using the bag mechanism for droplet breakup and the electrical bilayer at the surface of water.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrospray Ionization for Mass Spectrometry of Large Biomolecules
Fenn, J. B., Mann, M., Meng, C. K., Wong, S. F., & Whitehouse, C. M. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2675315 · Cited by 7,634
Cited by
Spontaneous Generation of Hydrogen Peroxide from Aqueous Microdroplets
Lee, J. K., Walker, K. L., Han, H. S., Kang, J., Prinz, F. B., Waymouth, R. M., Nam, H. G., & Zare, R. N. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1911883116 · Cited by 717
Sprayed Water Microdroplets Are Able to Generate Hydrogen Peroxide Spontaneously
Mehrgardi, M. A., Mofidfar, M., & Zare, R. N. (2022) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.2c02890 · Cited by 259
Enrichment Factors of Perfluoroalkyl Oxoanions at the Air/Water Interface
Psillakis, E., Cheng, J., Hoffmann, M. R., & Colussi, A. J. (2009) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp902795m · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Zilch, L. W., Maze, J. T., Smith, J. W., Ewing, G. E., & Jarrold, M. F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-11-26
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 51
- Pages
- 13352-13363
- ISSN
- 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5215
- OpenAlex
- W2048199503
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Charge Separation in the Aerodynamic Breakup of Micrometer-Sized Water Droplets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp806995h
- The paper
- Zilch, L. W., Maze, J. T., Smith, J. W., Ewing, G. E., & Jarrold, M. F. (2008). Charge Separation in the Aerodynamic Breakup of Micrometer-Sized Water Droplets. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp806995h
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.