Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 342

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CdSe Quantum Dot-Sensitized TiO2 Electrodes: Effect of Quantum Dot Coverage and Mode of Attachment

Guijarro, Néstor, Lana-Villarreal, Teresa, Mora-Seró, Iván, Bisquert, Juan, Gómez, Roberto·2009·The Journal of Physical Chemistry C

Abstract

We have investigated the sensitization of nanoporous titanium dioxide by previously synthesized CdSe quantum dots (QDs) protected with trioctylphosphine. Covering the nanoporous TiO 2 films with QDs has been achieved using two strategies: (i) direct adsorption from dichoromethane dispersions and (ii) anchoring the QDs through a molecular linker, concretely, mercaptopropionic acid (MPA). In contrast with MPA-mediated adsorption, direct adsorption leads to a high degree of QD aggregation, as revealed by atomic force microscopy (AFM) images obtained with both TiO 2 nanoporous films and monocrystalline surfaces. Importantly, at saturation, only 14% of the real surface area of a 5-μm thick P25 TiO 2 layer is covered for both attachment modes. For MPA attachment, the incident photon-to-current efficiency (IPCE) increases with the loading, whereas a maximum (close to 40% at the QD excitonic peak) is defined for intermediate coverages in the case of QD direct adsorption. In addition, for equivalent QD loading, IPCE values are larger in the case of direct adsorption.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp808091d

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 342

Metadata

Authors
Guijarro, N., Lana-Villarreal, T., Mora-Seró, I., Bisquert, J., & Gómez, R.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Published
2009-02-16
Volume
113
Issue
10
Pages
4208-4214
ISSN
  • 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-7455
OpenAlex
W2062670924
Cited by
342
References
28
FWCI
18.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.