The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dynamic Adsorption/Desorption Process Model for Capacitive Deionization
Open accessAbstract
In capacitive deionization (CDI), an electrical potential difference is applied across oppositely placed electrodes, resulting in the adsorption of ions from aqueous solution and a partially ion-depleted product stream. CDI is a dynamic process which operates in a sequential mode; i.e., after a certain ion adsorption capacity has been reached, the applied voltage is reduced, and ions are released back into solution, resulting in a solution concentrated in ions. The energetic input of CDI is very small, while there are no ion-exchange materials involved that need to be replaced regularly. Here we present a dynamic process model for CDI which includes the storage and release of ions in/from the polarization layers of the electrodes. The charge and ion adsorption capacity of the polarization layers is described using the equilibrium Gouy−Chapman−Stern (GCS) model, while the charge transfer rate from bulk solution into the polarization layer is modeled according to Ohm’s law, i.e., depends solely on an electric field term across a mass-transfer layer. An important element in the model is the differential charge efficiency: the effective salt removal rate relative to the electronic current, for which an analytical expression is derived based on the GCS model. We present results for the effluent salt concentration and electron current, both as function of time, based on a process model that assumes ideal mixing in the CDI unit cell. The theoretical results are in very good agreement with an example data set.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Anderson, M. A., Cudero, A. L., & Palma, J. (2010) · Electrochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2010.02.012 · Cited by 943
Application of Capacitive Deionisation in water desalination: A review
AlMarzooqi, F. A., Al Ghaferi, A. A., Saadat, I., & Hilal, N. (2014) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2014.02.031 · Cited by 527
Theory of membrane capacitive deionization including the effect of the electrode pore space
Biesheuvel, P. M., Zhao, R., Porada, S., & van der Wal, A. (2011) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2011.04.049 · Cited by 490
Self-citationZhang, C., Ma, J., Wu, L., Sun, J., Wang, L., Li, T., & Waite, T. D. (2021) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c06552 · Cited by 323
Diffuse charge and Faradaic reactions in porous electrodes
Biesheuvel, P. M., Fu, Y., & Bazant, M. Z. (2011) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.83.061507 · Cited by 293
Self-citationEnergy Efficiency of Capacitive Deionization
Wang, L., Dykstra, J. E., & Lin, S. (2019) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b04858 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Biesheuvel, P. M., van Limpt, B., & van der Wal, A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-03-03
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 5636-5640
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W2024006963
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.