The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Dynamic and Energetic Properties of Alkali and Halide Ions Using Water-Model-Specific Ion Parameters
Open accessAbstract
The dynamic and energetic properties of the alkali and halide ions were calculated using molecular dynamics (MD) and free energy simulations with various different water and ion force fields including our recently developed water-model-specific ion parameters. The properties calculated were activity coefficients, diffusion coefficients, residence times of atomic pairs, association constants, and solubility. Through calculation of these properties, we can assess the validity and range of applicability of the simple pair potential models and better understand their limitations. Due to extreme computational demands, the activity coefficients were only calculated for a subset of the models. The results qualitatively agree with experiment. Calculated diffusion coefficients and residence times between cation-anion, water-cation, and water-anion showed differences depending on the choice of water and ion force field used. The calculated solubilities of the alkali-halide salts were generally lower than the true solubility of the salts. However, for both the TIP4P(EW) and SPC/E water-model-specific ion parameters, solubility was reasonably well-reproduced. Finally, the correlations among the various properties led to the following conclusions: (1) The reliability of the ion force fields is significantly affected by the specific choice of water model. (2) Ion-ion interactions are very important to accurately simulate the properties, especially solubility. (3) The SPC/E and TIP4P(EW) water-model-specific ion force fields are preferred for simulation in high salt environments compared to the other ion force fields.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Amber biomolecular simulation programs
Case, D. A., Cheatham, T. E., Darden, T., Gohlke, H., Luo, R., Merz, K. M., Onufriev, A., Simmerling, C., Wang, B., & Woods, R. J. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20290 · Cited by 9,535
Self-citationMarcus, Y., & Hefter, G. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr040087x · Cited by 1,134
Solvent Structure, Dynamics, and Ion Mobility in Aqueous Solutions at 25 °C
Koneshan, S., Rasaiah, J. C., Lynden-Bell, R. M., & Lee, S. H. (1998) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp980642x · Cited by 965
Cited by
Deflating the RNA Mg 2+ bubble: stereochemistry to the rescue!
Auffinger, P., Ennifar, E., & D'Ascenzo, L. (2021) · RNA · doi:10.1261/rna.076067.120 · Cited by 29
Computational DNA binding studies of (–)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate
Galindo-Murillo, R., & Cheatham, T. E. (2018) · Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics · doi:10.1080/07391102.2017.1389306 · Cited by 27
Self-citationJanaszkiewicz, A., Tóth, Á., Faucher, Q., Martin, M., Chantemargue, B., Barin-Le Guellec, C., Marquet, P., & Di Meo, F. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-10755-2 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Joung, I. S., & Cheatham, T. E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-09-17
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 40
- Pages
- 13279-13290
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W2056211855
- Cited by
- 576
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Dynamic and Energetic Properties of Alkali and Halide Ions Using Water-Model-Specific Ion Parameters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp902584c
- The paper
- Joung, I. S., & Cheatham, T. E. (2009). Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Dynamic and Energetic Properties of Alkali and Halide Ions Using Water-Model-Specific Ion Parameters. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp902584c
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.