The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adsorption and Separation of Xylene Isomers and Ethylbenzene on Two Zn−Terephthalate Metal−Organic Frameworks
Abstract
Metal−organic frameworks (MOFs) with metal-containing secondary building units and organic linkers have great potential for the separation of isomers. In this work, the adsorption and separation of xylene isomers and ethylbenzene (EB) on two Zn−terephthalate MOFs (MOF-5 and MOF-monoclinic) were studied by means of pulse gas chromatography, static vapor-phase adsorption, and breakthrough adsorption. The two studied Zn−terephthalate MOFs showed different selectivity and efficiency for the separation of xylene isomers and EB. On MOF-5, EB eluted first, while other isomers eluted at the same time. MOF-monoclinic showed a preferable adsorption of p -xylene over other isomers. The adsorption and separation of xylene isomers and EB were equilibrium-constant-controlled on MOF-5 and diffusion-dominated on MOF-monoclinic. On the basis of the measured McReynolds constants, MOF-5 was characterized as a stationary phase of nonpolarity, whereas MOF-monoclinic as a stationary phase of intermediate polarity for gas chromatography.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal-organic frameworks with high capacity and selectivity for harmful gases
Britt, D., Tranchemontagne, D., & Yaghi, O. M. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0804900105 · Cited by 958
Cited by
Metal–Organic Frameworks for Separations
Li, J.-R., Sculley, J., & Zhou, H.-C. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200190s · Cited by 6,323
Metal–Organic Frameworks for Separation
Zhao, X., Wang, Y., Li, D., Bu, X., & Feng, P. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201705189 · Cited by 1,305
Yang, L., Qian, S., Wang, X., Cui, X., Chen, B., & Xing, H. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c9cs00756c · Cited by 746
Self-citationGu, Z.-Y., Yang, C.-X., Chang, N., & Yan, X.-P. (2012) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar2002599 · Cited by 674
Self-citationMetal–Organic Frameworks for Food Safety
Wang, P.-L., Xie, L.-H., Joseph, E. A., Li, J.-R., Su, X.-O., & Zhou, H.-C. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00257 · Cited by 533
Chang, N., Gu, Z.-Y., & Yan, X.-P. (2010) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja1058229 · Cited by 379
Self-citationCD-MOF: A Versatile Separation Medium
Hartlieb, K. J., Holcroft, J. M., Moghadam, P. Z., Vermeulen, N. A., Algaradah, M. M., Nassar, M. S., Botros, Y. Y., Snurr, R. Q., & Stoddart, J. F. (2016) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.5b12860 · Cited by 323
Comparison of the Behavior of Metal–Organic Frameworks and Zeolites for Hydrocarbon Separations
Peralta, D., Chaplais, G., Simon-Masseron, A., Barthelet, K., Chizallet, C., Quoineaud, A.-A., & Pirngruber, G. D. (2012) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja211864w · Cited by 290
Discrimination of xylene isomers in a stacked coordination polymer
Li, L., Guo, L., Olson, D. H., Xian, S., Zhang, Z., Yang, Q., Wu, K., Yang, Y., Bao, Z., Ren, Q., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abj7659 · Cited by 280
Zhao, Z., Wang, S., Yang, Y., Li, X., Li, J., & Li, Z. (2015) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2014.08.012 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Gu, Z.-Y., Jiang, D.-Q., Wang, H.-F., Cui, X.-Y., & Yan, X.-P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-12-14
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 311-316
- ISSN
- 1932-7447 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-7455
- OpenAlex
- W1974059126
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
