Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 561

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Comprehensive Analytical Treatment of Continuum Electrostatics

Schaefer, Michael, Karplus, Martin·1996·The Journal of Physical Chemistry

Abstract

An analytical treatment of the continuum model for electrostatic solvation is presented and shown to be in good agreement with numerical finite-difference continuum calculations for the same system. Because the analytic method, called ACE, is relatively fast and yields a pairwise potential from which gradients and second derivatives can be obtained, its use with molecular mechanics/molecular dynamics programs will be possible. For calculating the self-energies of molecules in aqueous solution, a new analytic method is introduced. It is based on a continuum electrostatics model in which charges are defined as Gaussian charge distributions, rather than point charges, and in which the solute interior is described by a continuous density function. The self-energy potential is a pairwise energy function which only depends on charges, interatomic distances, and the effective, solvent-inaccessible volumes of the atoms. The potential is derived by integrating the energy density of the electric field and termed the integrated field (IF) method. A combination of the analytic self-energy potential with the generalized Born equation for charge−charge interactions, 1-3 termed analytic continuum electrostatics (ACE) potential, makes possible an analytic treatment of the electrostatic contribution to solvation. The focusing of field lines is included. The IF method is applied to the calculation of self-energies of all charges on a series of small organic compounds and the protein bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor (BPTI). The agreement with self-energies as calculated using a finite-difference program is excellent for small molecules and satisfactory for BPTI. Application of the combined ACE potential to the calculation of solvation energies of small compounds shows good agreement with results of finite-difference calculations. The potential on a plane through the protein superoxide dismutase using ACE and a finite-difference program is in good agreement. For the calculation of the solvation energies of small molecules (20 atoms), ACE is more than 3 orders of magnitude faster than the program UHBD 91 which was used for all numerical continuum electrostatics calculations; for BPTI, the speedup is more than 2 orders of magnitude.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp9521621

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 561

Metadata

Authors
Schaefer, M., & Karplus, M.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry
Published
1996-01-01
Volume
100
Issue
5
Pages
1578-1599
ISSN
  • 0022-3654 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-5740
OpenAlex
W2065101872
Cited by
561
References
0
FWCI
8.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comprehensive Analytical Treatment of Continuum Electrostatics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp9521621
The paper
Schaefer, M., & Karplus, M. (1996). A Comprehensive Analytical Treatment of Continuum Electrostatics. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9521621

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.