The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Does Fe+ Activate C−C and C−H Bonds in Ethane? A Theoretical Investigation Using Density Functional Theory
Abstract
The potential energy surface (PES) corresponding to the reaction of the iron cation with ethane, which represents a prototype of the activation of C−C and C−H bonds in alkanes by transition metal cations, has been investigated employing the recently suggested hybrid density functional theory/Hartree−Fock method (B3LYP) combined with reasonably large one-particle basis sets. The performance of this computational approach has been calibrated against experimentally known Fe + −R binding energies of fragments R relevant to the [Fe,C 2,H 6 ] + PES and against the relative energies of the possible exit channels. Both the C−C and C−H bond activation branches of the PES are characterized by a low barrier for the first step, the insertion of the iron cation into a C−C and C−H bond, respectively. Rate determining are the second steps which in the C−C bond activation branch corresponds to an [1,3]-H shift leading to a complex between Fe CH 2 + and methane. Along the C−H activation reaction coordinate, no transition state corresponding to a β-hydrogen shift resulting in a dihydrido species could be located, even though such a step has been often postulated. The decisive step is rather a concerted saddle point connecting the C−H inserted species directly with a complex of Fe + with molecular hydrogen and ethylene. The mechanistic scenario provided by our calculations is in concert with all experimental information and allows for the first time a detailed and consistent view on the mechanistic details of this import reaction sequence. It further demonstrates the usefulness of the B3LYP approach for describing even complex electronic situations such as present in open-shell transition metal compounds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new mixing of Hartree–Fock and local density-functional theories
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464304 · Cited by 16,515
Cited by
A Chemist's Guide to Density Functional Theory
Koch, W., & Holthausen, M. C. (2001) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/3527600043 · Cited by 4,880
Self-citationSelective Activation of Alkanes by Gas-Phase Metal Ions
Roithová, J., & Schröder, D. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900183p · Cited by 477
Metadata
- Authors
- Holthausen, M. C., Fiedler, A., Schwarz, H., & Koch, W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 6236-6242
- ISSN
- 0022-3654 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-5740
- OpenAlex
- W2042925035
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.