Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 202

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Interaction of Water with Brønsted Acidic Sites of Zeolite Catalysts. Ab Initio Study of 1:1 and 2:1 Surface Complexes

Krossner, Mariann, Sauer, Joachim·1996·The Journal of Physical Chemistry

Abstract

The adsorption of one and two water molecules on cluster models of Brønsted acid sites of zeolite catalysts has been investigated by ab initio quantum chemical methods at the Hartree−Fock self-consistent field (HF), at the second-order Møller−Plesset perturbation theory (MP2), and at the density functional theory (DFT) levels. Among the two possible structures of the 1:1 adsorption complex, the water H-bonded to the zeolitic OH group (neutral complex) and the hydroxonium ion attached to the negatively charged zeolite surface (ion pair), only the former is a minimum. The ion pair complex is a transition structure for the proton transfer from one lattice oxygen to a neighboring one via the adsorbed water. However, the energy difference between both structures is only a few kJ/mol. For the neutral 1:1 adsorption complex we predict an average shift of the three protons involved of 7−8 ppm; the observed shifts are 6−7 ppm for one water molecule per site. The vibrational frequencies calculated for the ion pair structure do not permit an interpretation of the observed infrared spectrum. For the neutral structure (MP2) we predict frequencies of 1317 and 1022 cm -1 for the zeolitic in-plane and out-of-plane modes, respectively, while the zeolitic OH stretching mode is strongly red-shifted down to 2740−2850 cm -1 . These data support a recent interpretation of the IR spectrum which explains the observed triplet of bands as a result of Fermi resonance between the strongly perturbed zeolitic OH stretch and the OH bending overtones. The MP2 calculations for the neutral complex also provide a complete assignment of the peaks observed by inelastic neutron scattering for water on H-mordenite. Inclusion of electron correlation proves crucial, and comparison of MP2 and DFT (gradient corrected functionals) methods is made. While energy differences are very similar, the DFT approach yields by far too large frequency shifts for OH donor groups in H bonds. When a second water molecule is added (2:1 complex), both the neutral and the ion pair structure prove to be local minima on the potential energy surface. The adsorption energy is found to drop by 25%, and the ion pair structure becomes the more stable one. Predictions are made on how the vibrational spectra and the 1 H NMR chemical shifts change.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp952775d

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 202

Metadata

Authors
Krossner, M., & Sauer, J.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry
Published
1996-01-01
Volume
100
Issue
15
Pages
6199-6211
ISSN
  • 0022-3654 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-5740
OpenAlex
W2952677865
Cited by
202
References
0
FWCI
17.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interaction of Water with Brønsted Acidic Sites of Zeolite Catalysts. Ab Initio Study of 1:1 and 2:1 Surface Complexes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp952775d
The paper
Krossner, M., & Sauer, J. (1996). Interaction of Water with Brønsted Acidic Sites of Zeolite Catalysts. Ab Initio Study of 1:1 and 2:1 Surface Complexes. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp952775d

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.