The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ultrafast Studies of Photoexcited Electron Dynamics in γ- and α-Fe2O3 Semiconductor Nanoparticles
Abstract
The ultrafast dynamics of photoexcited electrons in the semiconductor iron oxides, γ-Fe 2 O 3 and α-Fe 2 O 3, have been measured using femtosecond laser spectroscopy. Transmission electron microscopy shows the γ-Fe 2 O 3 particles are spherical, with 1−2 nm average diameter, and the α-Fe 2 O 3 are spindle-shaped, with average dimensions of 1 × 5 nm. Static electronic absorption measurements of the colloids suggest that they may be in the quantum confined regime. Steady-state emission measurements show that the <400 nm direct transitions are moderately emissive, but the indirect transitions in the visible do not produce measurable emission. The ultrafast transient absorption decay profiles measured for the γ-Fe 2 O 3 and α-Fe 2 O 3 samples synthesized in our lab as well as a commercial sample of γ-Fe 2 O 3 are the same and are fit best with three exponentials with 0.36, 4.2, and 67 ps time constants. The decay profiles are independent of pump power, probe wavelength, and pH and were not affected by lattice doping with other metals or surface adsorbates for the cases studied. This fast overall decay, in conjunction with very weak fluorescence, suggests extremely efficient nonradiative relaxation, possibly related to the dense band structure, a high density of trap states, or simply strong coupling between trap states. The fast relaxation of photoexcited electrons in the conduction band and trap states is consistent with the low photocurrent efficiency of typical Fe 2 O 3 electrodes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chemistry and Properties of Nanocrystals of Different Shapes
Burda, C., Chen, X., Narayanan, R., & El-Sayed, M. A. (2005) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr030063a · Cited by 7,230
Heterogeneous Photocatalysis: Recent Advances and Applications
Ibhadon, A., & Fitzpatrick, P. (2013) · Catalysts · doi:10.3390/catal3010189 · Cited by 1,409
Multigram Scale Synthesis and Characterization of Monodisperse Tetragonal Zirconia Nanocrystals
Joo, J., Yu, T., Kim, Y. W., Park, H. M., Wu, F., Zhang, J. Z., & Hyeon, T. (2003) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja034258b · Cited by 412
Self-citationPalanisamy, S., & Wang, Y.-M. (2019) · Dalton Transactions · doi:10.1039/c9dt00459a · Cited by 230
Metadata
- Authors
- Cherepy, N. J., Liston, D. B., Lovejoy, J. A., Deng, H., & Zhang, J. Z.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-01-01
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 770-776
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W2011702886
- Cited by
- 528
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.