Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 537

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Molecular and Atomic Polarizabilities: Thole's Model Revisited

van Duijnen, Piet Th., Swart, Marcel·1998·The Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Abstract

Thole's modified dipole interaction model for constructing molecular polarizabilities from effective, isotropic atomic polarizabilities is reviewed and extended. We report effective atomic polarizabilities for H, C, N, O, S, and the halogen atoms, independent of their chemical environment. They are obtained by fitting the model both to experimental and calculated molecular polarizabilities, the latter to enable one to model ab initio polarizabilities for various basis sets.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp980221f

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
van Duijnen, P. T., & Swart, M.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
Published
1998-03-12
Volume
102
Issue
14
Pages
2399-2407
ISSN
  • 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5215
OpenAlex
W2057554431
Cited by
537
References
0
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.