The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Hybrid QM−MM Potential Employing Hartree−Fock or Density Functional Methods in the Quantum Region
Abstract
A hybrid quantum mechanical−molecular mechanical (QM−MM) potential energy function with ab initio and density functional capabilities has been implemented in the CHARMM program. It makes use of the quantum mechanical program CADPAC and the CHARMM molecular mechanics energy function; a GAMESS(US) interface to the CHARMM program was already available. To test the methodology, a series of relatively small systems are studied and comparisons are made of full QM calculations with those from various QM−MM partitions. Both density functional and Hartree−Fock calculations for the quantum region are presented and, where possible, compared with results from previous AM1−MM calculations. For the density functional based QM−MM calculations, the LDA and BLYP functionals were used. The performances of both the density functional and Hartree−Fock based QM−MM calculations compare well with pure quantum calculations. The link atom method was tested by performing a number of QM−MM simulations on the complexes of metal cations with model ligands of biological interest. It was found that it gave good results for the structures, binding energies, and charge distributions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Massova, I., & Kollman, P. A. (2000) · Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design · doi:10.1023/a:1008763014207 · Cited by 1,015
Friesner, R. A., & Guallar, V. (2005) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.55.091602.094410 · Cited by 522
QM/MM Methods for Biological Systems
Senn, H. M., & Thiel, W. (2006) · Topics in Current Chemistry · doi:10.1007/128_2006_084 · Cited by 428
Frontier Bonds in QM/MM Methods: A Comparison of Different Approaches
Reuter, N., Dejaegere, A., Maigret, B., & Karplus, M. (2000) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp9924124 · Cited by 398
Self-citationBiomolecular simulation and modelling: status, progress and prospects
van der Kamp, M. W., Shaw, K. E., Woods, C. J., & Mulholland, A. J. (2008) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2008.0105.focus · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Lyne, P. D., Hodoscek, M., & Karplus, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1999-04-15
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 3462-3471
- ISSN
- 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5215
- OpenAlex
- W2049777816
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.