The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Molecular Theories and Simulation of Ions and Polar Molecules in Water
Open accessAbstract
Recent developments in molecular theories and simulation of ions and polar molecules in water are reviewed. The hydration of imidazole and imidazolium is used to exemplify the theoretical issues. The treatment of long-ranged electrostatic interactions in simulations is discussed extensively. It is argued that the Ewald approach is an easy way to get correct hydration free energies corresponding to thermodynamic limit from molecular calculations. Molecular simulations with Ewald interactions and periodic boundary conditions can also be more efficient than many common alternatives. The Ewald treatment permits a conclusive extrapolation to infinite system size. Accurate results for well-defined models have permitted careful testing of simple theories of electrostatic hydration free energies, such as dielectric continuum models. The picture that emerges from such testing is that the most prominent failings of the simplest theories are associated with solvent proton conformations that lead to non-Gaussian fluctuations of electrostatic potentials. Thus, the most favorable cases for second-order perturbation theories are monoatomic positive ions. For polar and anionic solutes, continuum or Gaussian theories are less accurate. The appreciation of the specific deficiencies of those simple models have led to new concepts, multistate Gaussian and quasi-chemical theories, which address the cases for which the simpler theories fail. It is argued that, relative to direct dielectric continuum treatments, the quasi-chemical theories provide a better theoretical organization for the computational study of the electronic structure of solution species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Implicit Solvation Models: Equilibria, Structure, Spectra, and Dynamics
Cramer, C. J., & Truhlar, D. G. (1999) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr960149m · Cited by 2,308
Yeh, I.-C., & Hummer, G. (2004) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp0477147 · Cited by 1,522
Self-citationHow Ions Affect the Structure of Water
Hribar, B., Southall, N. T., Vlachy, V., & Dill, K. A. (2002) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja026014h · Cited by 860
Classical Electrostatics for Biomolecular Simulations
Cisneros, G. A., Karttunen, M., Ren, P., & Sagui, C. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300461d · Cited by 259
Thermodynamically dominant hydration structures of aqueous ions
Merchant, S., & Asthagiri, D. (2009) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3132709 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Hummer, G., Pratt, L. R., & García, A. E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-09-22
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 41
- Pages
- 7885-7895
- ISSN
- 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5215
- OpenAlex
- W1992782574
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Theories and Simulation of Ions and Polar Molecules in Water. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp982195r
- The paper
- Hummer, G., Pratt, L. R., & García, A. E. (1998). Molecular Theories and Simulation of Ions and Polar Molecules in Water. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp982195r
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.