The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Systematic Failing of Current Density Functionals: Overestimation of Two-Center Three-Electron Bonding Energies
Open accessAbstract
Several density functional theories, chosen among the most popular, are shown to systematically overestimate three-electron bond dissociation energies in a series of model systems covering the full range of homonuclear three-electron X∴X bonds (X = He, N, O, F, Ne, P, S, Cl, Ar) that can be found in organic cation radicals. The errors range from 15 to 54 kcal/mol with the SVWN local spin density method, from 6 to 45 kcal/mol with the gradient-corrected BLYP, BP86, and BPW91 functionals, and from 3 to 31 kcal/mol with the B3LYP, B3P86, and B3PW91 three-parameter hybrid functionals. The errors follow some regular tendencies according to the place of the X atom in the periodic table. The geometries and frequencies are also in error, the bond lengths being systematically too long and the frequencies too low. The errors are tentatively interpreted as consequences of electron self-interaction, leading to overstabilization of the Coulombic terms relative to the exchange-correlation terms in this type of bonds. At variance with these systematic errors, the BH&HLYP functional displays overall better results but still severely fails in some particular cases. Some lines of thought for devising modified DFT functionals are proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new mixing of Hartree–Fock and local density-functional theories
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464304 · Cited by 16,515
Cited by
Long-range corrected hybrid density functionals with damped atom–atom dispersion corrections
Chai, J.-D., & Head-Gordon, M. (2008) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b810189b · Cited by 14,648
Density functional theory for transition metals and transition metal chemistry
Cramer, C. J., & Truhlar, D. G. (2009) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b907148b · Cited by 1,648
Tests of functionals for systems with fractional electron number
Vydrov, O. A., Scuseria, G. E., & Perdew, J. P. (2007) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2723119 · Cited by 655
Long-range corrected double-hybrid density functionals
Chai, J.-D., & Head-Gordon, M. (2009) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3244209 · Cited by 419
Romero, N. A., & Nicewicz, D. A. (2014) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja506228u · Cited by 377
Metadata
- Authors
- Braïda, B., Hiberty, P. C., & Savin, A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1998-09-09
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 40
- Pages
- 7872-7877
- ISSN
- 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5215
- OpenAlex
- W1983805579
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Systematic Failing of Current Density Functionals: Overestimation of Two-Center Three-Electron Bonding Energies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp982441z
- The paper
- Braïda, B., Hiberty, P. C., & Savin, A. (1998). A Systematic Failing of Current Density Functionals: Overestimation of Two-Center Three-Electron Bonding Energies. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp982441z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.