Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,149

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Proton's Absolute Aqueous Enthalpy and Gibbs Free Energy of Solvation from Cluster-Ion Solvation Data

Tissandier, Michael D., Cowen, Kenneth A., Feng, Wan Yong, Gundlach, Ellen, Cohen, Michael H., Earhart, Alan D., Coe, James V., Tuttle, Thomas R.·1998·The Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Abstract

A method is presented to determine the absolute hydration enthalpy of the proton, Δ H aq °[H + ], from a set of cluster-ion solvation data without the use of extra thermodynamic assumptions. The absolute proton hydration enthalpy has been found to be ∼50 kJ/mol different than traditional values and has been more precisely determined (by about an order of magnitude). Conventional ion solvation properties, based on the standard heat of formation of H + (aq) set to zero, have been devised that may be confusing to the uninitiated but are useful in thermochemical evaluations because they avoid the unnecessary introduction of the larger uncertainties in our knowledge of absolute values. In a similar strategy, we have motivated the need for a reassessment of Δ H aq °[H + ] by the trends with increased clustering in conventional cluster-ion solvation enthalpy differences for pairs of oppositely charged cluster ions. The consequences of particular preferred values for Δ H aq °[H + ] may be evaluated with regard to cluster-ion properties and how they connect to the bulk. While this approach defines the problem and is strongly suggestive of the currently determined proton value, it requires extra thermodynamic assumptions for a definitive determination. Instead, a unique reassessment has been accomplished without extra thermodynamic assumptions, based on the known fraction of bulk absolute solvation enthalpies obtained by pairs of oppositely charged cluster ions at particular cluster sizes. This approach, called the cluster-pair-based approximation for Δ H aq °[H + ], becomes exact for the idealized pair of ions that have obtained the same fraction of their bulk values at the same cluster size. The true value of Δ H aq °[H + ] is revealed by the linear deviations of real pairs of ions from this idealized behavior. Since the approximation becomes exact for a specific pair of oppositely charged ions, the true value of Δ H aq °[H + ] is expected to be commonly shared on plots of the approximation vs the difference in cluster-ion solvation enthalpy for pairs of ions sharing the same number of solvating waters. The common points on such plots determine values of −1150.1 ± 0.9 kJ/mol (esd) for Δ H aq °[H + ] and −1104.5 ± 0.3 kJ/mol (esd) for Δ G aq °[H + ]. The uncertainties (representing only the random errors of the procedure) are smaller than expected because the cluster data of 20 different pairings of oppositely charged ions are folded into the determination.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp982638r

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 1,149

Metadata

Authors
Tissandier, M. D., Cowen, K. A., Feng, W. Y., Gundlach, E., Cohen, M. H., Earhart, A. D., Coe, J. V., & Tuttle, T. R.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
Published
1998-09-11
Volume
102
Issue
40
Pages
7787-7794
ISSN
  • 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5215
OpenAlex
W1999248820
Cited by
1,149
References
1
FWCI
5.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.