The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of the Charge-Collection Efficiency of Dye-Sensitized Nanocrystalline TiO2 Solar Cells
Abstract
Intensity modulated photovoltage spectroscopy (IMVS) and intensity modulated photocurrent spectroscopy (IMPS) are used to evaluate the charge-collection efficiency of dye-sensitized nanocrystalline TiO 2 solar cells. The charge-collection efficiency of the photoinjected electrons from dye sensitization is estimated from the respective time constants for charge recombination at open circuit τ oc and the combined processes of charge collection and charge recombination at short circuit τ sc obtained by IMVS and IMPS measurements. Three models are developed for relating the charge-collection efficiency to τ oc /τ sc . The first model determines the charge-collection efficiency from τ oc /τ sc without considering the underlying physical processes measured by IMVS and IMPS. The second model obtains τ oc /τ sc by simulating the frequency response of IMVS and IMPS from the time-dependent continuity equation for simplified conditions. The third model determines the time constants for IMVS and IMPS from electron-concentration profiles calculated for constant light intensity and more realistic conditions. To obtain a realistic steady-state electron concentration profile, a nonlinear dependence of the rate of recombination on the electron concentration in the TiO 2 film is considered. Furthermore, the continuity equation is modified to account for charge trapping and detrapping. For the first time, expressions are derived for calculating the time constants from the steady-state electron concentration profile. The validity of this method is demonstrated for the second model from which the exact IMPS and IMVS responses are calculated. The three models are compared with each other. A simple expression is derived for calculating the charge-collection efficiency from the measured values of τ oc /τ sc and the light intensity dependence of τ oc .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films
O'Regan, B., & Grätzel, M. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/353737a0 · Cited by 28,599
Cited by
Comparison of Dye-Sensitized Rutile- and Anatase-Based TiO2Solar Cells
Park, N.-G., van de Lagemaat, J., & Frank, A. J. (2000) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp994365l · Cited by 1,121
Self-citationvan de Lagemaat, J., Park, N.-G., & Frank, A. J. (2000) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp993172v · Cited by 788
Self-citationCounter electrodes in dye-sensitized solar cells
Wu, J., Lan, Z., Lin, J., Huang, M., Huang, Y., Fan, L., Luo, G., Lin, Y., Xie, Y., & Wei, Y. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00752j · Cited by 788
Advances in Liquid‐Electrolyte and Solid‐State Dye‐Sensitized Solar Cells
Snaith, H. J., & Schmidt‐Mende, L. (2007) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200602903 · Cited by 616
Aqueous dye-sensitized solar cells
Bella, F., Gerbaldi, C., Barolo, C., & Grätzel, M. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00456f · Cited by 470
Metadata
- Authors
- Schlichthörl, G., Park, N. G., & Frank, A. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1999-01-20
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 782-791
- ISSN
- 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6106
- OpenAlex
- W2015769003
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of the Charge-Collection Efficiency of Dye-Sensitized Nanocrystalline TiO2 Solar Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp9831177
- The paper
- Schlichthörl, G., Park, N. G., & Frank, A. J. (1999). Evaluation of the Charge-Collection Efficiency of Dye-Sensitized Nanocrystalline TiO2 Solar Cells. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9831177
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.