Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 301

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nanosphere Lithography: Surface Plasmon Resonance Spectrum of a Periodic Array of Silver Nanoparticles by Ultraviolet−Visible Extinction Spectroscopy and Electrodynamic Modeling

Jensen, Traci R., Schatz, George C., Van Duyne, Richard P.·1999·The Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Abstract

In this paper we measure the optical extinction spectrum of a periodic array of silver nanoparticles fabricated by nanosphere lithography (NSL) and present detailed comparisons of the results with predictions of electrodynamic theory. The silver nanoparticles are small (∼100 nm) compared to the wavelength of light but too large to have their optical properties described adequately with a simple electrostatic model. We make use of the discrete dipole approximation (DDA), which is a coupled finite element method. With the DDA one can calculate the extinction of light as a function of wavelength for particles of arbitrary size and shape. We show that NSL-fabricated Ag nanoparticles can be modeled without adjustable parameters as truncated tetrahedrons, taking their size and shape parameters directly from atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements and using literature values of the bulk dielectric constants of silver. These AFM measurements are presented as part of this paper, and the resulting theoretical line shapes and peak widths based on the AFM-derived parameters are in good agreement with measured extinction spectra. The peak width measured as the full width at half-maximum (fwhm) is approximately 100 nm, or 0.35 eV, which corresponds to an electron−hole pair lifetime of 2 fs. The combined effects of particle−particle and particle−substrate interactions red-shift the surface plasmon resonance by only about 10 nm versus a single isolated particle. By use of AFM-derived parameters that have been corrected for tip-broadening and by inclusion of an estimate for the effects of particle−particle and particle−substrate interaction, the discrepancy between the theoretical and experimental extinction peak maxima is approximately 25 nm, which is significantly smaller than the plasmon width. This residual difference between theory and experiment is due to shortcomings of the truncated tetrahedron geometry in describing the actual shape of the particles, errors in the literature values of the bulk dielectric constants, and experimental uncertainty due to slight heterogeneities in nanoparticle structure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp984406y

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 301

Metadata

Authors
Jensen, T. R., Schatz, G. C., & Van Duyne, R. P.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
1999-03-13
Volume
103
Issue
13
Pages
2394-2401
ISSN
  • 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6106
OpenAlex
W2023654186
Cited by
301
References
1
FWCI
7.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nanosphere Lithography: Surface Plasmon Resonance Spectrum of a Periodic Array of Silver Nanoparticles by Ultraviolet−Visible Extinction Spectroscopy and Electrodynamic Modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jp984406y
The paper
Jensen, T. R., Schatz, G. C., & Van Duyne, R. P. (1999). Nanosphere Lithography: Surface Plasmon Resonance Spectrum of a Periodic Array of Silver Nanoparticles by Ultraviolet−Visible Extinction Spectroscopy and Electrodynamic Modeling. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp984406y

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.