Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 283

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preparation, Characterization, and Performance of Fe−ZSM-5 Catalysts

Joyner, Richard, Stockenhuber, Michael·1999·The Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Abstract

A number of iron−ZSM-5 catalysts have been prepared and characterized by X-ray absorption spectroscopy using fluorescence detection, electron spectroscopy, temperature-programmed reduction, infrared spectroscopy, and electron microscopy. Iron has been introduced by aqueous exchange, by a novel method recently proposed by Feng and Hall ( Catal . Lett . 1996, 41, 45), by exchange from a rigorously dried methanolic solution accompanied by agitation with ultrasound, and by a method intended to promote solid-state exchange. The degree of interaction with the zeolite framework has been probed by examining the effect on the zeolite proton OH band in the infrared spectrum. Less than 30% of the protons were exchanged from aqueous solution, but almost 80% exchange was achieved using ultrasound, as well as by the method reported by Feng and Hall (FH). Initially, both methods exhibited mainly isolated metal ions; however, calcination of the samples prepared according to FH exhibited rather large oxide clusters. After aqueous exchange and activation, most of the iron is present in the form of small oxygen-containing nanoclusters within the zeolite matrix, with EXAFS measurements indicating an average composition of Fe 4 O 4, although electron microscopy identifies some larger particles at the external surface of the zeolite. Depending on the preparation methods, isolated cationic species within the zeolite matrix were also found. The small Fe 4 O 4 type clusters cannot be reduced to the metallic state, even by hydrogen at 1100 K, although interconversion between Fe(II) and Fe(III) is facile. When the zeolite was exposed to nitric oxide, stretching vibrations corresponding to adsorption on the different iron species present could be identified by infrared spectroscopy. It is proposed that the ultrastable iron−oxygen nanoclusters have structures similar either to the iron−sulfur compounds ferredoxin II of desulfovibrio Gigas or to the cubanes of high-potential iron protein (HIPIP). Reactivity of these Fe−ZSM-5 materials in the selective catalytic reduction of NO x by propene in oxygen/helium differs significantly, depending irreversibly on whether they are initially activated in oxygen or in an inert atmosphere. Correlations between catalytic activity and the infrared spectroscopy results for adsorbed NO indicate that the nanoclusters are more active (per iron atom) in the SCR reaction than the isolated cations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jp990978m

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Joyner, R., & Stockenhuber, M.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
1999-07-01
Volume
103
Issue
29
Pages
5963-5976
ISSN
  • 1520-5207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6106
OpenAlex
W2016392805
Cited by
283
References
1
FWCI
14.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.