The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probing Free Multiply Charged Anions Using Photodetachment Photoelectron Spectroscopy
Abstract
Multiply charged anions are common in the condensed phase, and their existence has been generally taken for granted. But until very recently, these species have only rarely been observed in the gas phase. A new experimental technique, using photodetachment photoelectron spectroscopy, electrospray, and ion-trap mass spectrometry, has been developed in the author's laboratory to probe multiply charged anions in the gas phase. In this article, the principles of this technique and some of the initial results will be presented and discussed. The difference between photodetachment of singly and multiply charged anions is emphasized. Photodetachment photoelectron spectroscopy is ideal to probe the chemical and physical properties of free multiply charged anions. Among the initial findings, the repulsive Coulomb barriers existing in multiply charged anions have been directly observed. The relationship between the intramolecular electron−electron repulsion and the potential barrier is elucidated, culminating in the first observation of a negative electron binding energy in a quadruply charged anion. Electron tunneling effects through the repulsive Coulomb barriers are also observed and interpreted using a model Coulomb potential and the theory developed to understand α-decay in nuclear physics. We show that the electrospray technique provides a unique means that allow solution phase species and chemistry to be investigated in the gas phase with molecular details and specificity but without the complication of the condensed phase environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrospray Ionization for Mass Spectrometry of Large Biomolecules
Fenn, J. B., Mann, M., Meng, C. K., Wong, S. F., & Whitehouse, C. M. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2675315 · Cited by 7,634
Cited by
Atomic and Molecular Electron Affinities: Photoelectron Experiments and Theoretical Computations
Rienstra-Kiracofe, J. C., Tschumper, G. S., Schaefer, H. F., Nandi, S., & Ellison, G. B. (2002) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr990044u · Cited by 1,258
Simons, J. (2008) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp711490b · Cited by 417
Noodleman, L., Lovell, T., Han, W.-G., Li, J., & Himo, F. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr020625a · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, L.-S., & Wang, X.-B.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2000-02-18
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1978-1990
- ISSN
- 1089-5639 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5215
- OpenAlex
- W182381116
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.