Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 500

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Human Intestinal Permeability

Lennernaäs, Hans·1998·Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Abstract

This review focuses on permeability measurements in humans, briefly discussing different perfusion techniques, the relevance of human Peff values, and various aspects of in vivo transport mechanisms. In addition, human Peff values are compared with corresponding data from three preclinical transport models. The regional human jejunal perfusion technique has been validated in several important ways. One of the most important findings is that there is a good correlation between the measured human effective permeability values and the extent of absorption of drugs in humans determined by pharmacokinetic studies. Estimations of the absorption half-lives from the measured Peff agree very well with the time to maximal amount of the dose absorbed achieved after an oral dose in humans. We have also shown that it is possible to determine the Peff for carrier-mediated transported compounds and to classify them according to the proposed biopharmaceutical classification system (BCS). Furthermore, human in vivo permeabilities can be predicted using preclinical permeability models, such as in situ perfusion of rat jejunum, the Caco-2 model, and excised intestinal segments in the Ussing chamber. The permeability of passively transported compounds can be predicted with a particularly high degree of accuracy. However, special care must be taken for drugs with a carrier-mediated transport mechanism, and a scaling factor has to be used. Finally, the data obtained in vivo in humans emphasize the need for more clinical studies investigating the effect of physiological in vivo factors and molecular mechanisms influencing the transport of drugs across the intestinal and as well as other membrane barriers. It will also be important to study the effect of antitransport mechanisms (multidrug resistance, MDR), such as efflux by P-glycoprotein(s) and gut wall metabolism, for example CYP 3A4, on bioavailability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/js970332a

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 500

Metadata

Authors
Lennernaäs, H.
Venue
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Published
1998-04
Volume
87
Issue
4
Pages
403-410
ISSN
0022-3549 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1499935265
Cited by
500
References
3
FWCI
6.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.